Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage with spectrophotometry of cerebrospinal fluid- A comparison of two methods
(2022) In Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 60(7). p.1053-1057- Abstract
Objectives: Spectrophotometric absorption curve analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for oxyhaemoglobin and bilirubin is necessary to accurately diagnose subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in patients with typical symptoms but with negative findings on X-ray examinations. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two methods for interpreting absorption curves; one method from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK-NEQAS) and the other from the national quality assurance programme in Sweden (Equalis). Methods: Consecutive absorbance curves (n=336) were interpreted with two different methods, and their performance was compared to the diagnosis as stated in the patient records. Results: The UK-NEQAS method... (More)
Objectives: Spectrophotometric absorption curve analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for oxyhaemoglobin and bilirubin is necessary to accurately diagnose subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in patients with typical symptoms but with negative findings on X-ray examinations. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two methods for interpreting absorption curves; one method from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK-NEQAS) and the other from the national quality assurance programme in Sweden (Equalis). Methods: Consecutive absorbance curves (n=336) were interpreted with two different methods, and their performance was compared to the diagnosis as stated in the patient records. Results: The UK-NEQAS method displayed equal sensitivity to the Equalis method, but the specificity of the UK-NEQAS method was significantly higher than the Equalis method resulting in fewer false positive results. For UK-NEQAS, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84.6% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7% were observed, whereas the Equalis method had a PPV of 27.5% and an NPV of 99.7%. Conclusions: The semi-automated method based on the guidelines from UK-NEQAS provides an efficient and correct interpretation of absorbance curves with short turn-around times. We propose using this method for the routine interpretation of CSF spectrophotometric curves.
(Less)
- author
- Clarin, Marcus ; Petersson, Annika LU ; Zetterberg, Henrik LU and Ekblom, Kim LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-06-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- keywords
- absorptiometry, cerebrospinal fluid, spectrophotometry, subarachnoid haemorrhage
- in
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- volume
- 60
- issue
- 7
- pages
- 1053 - 1057
- publisher
- De Gruyter
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:35420000
- scopus:85129058829
- ISSN
- 1434-6621
- DOI
- 10.1515/cclm-2021-1320
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Marcus Clarin et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
- id
- 7333c128-a476-4358-b129-08a6f909da98
- date added to LUP
- 2026-02-17 14:15:58
- date last changed
- 2026-02-18 07:41:14
@article{7333c128-a476-4358-b129-08a6f909da98,
abstract = {{<p>Objectives: Spectrophotometric absorption curve analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for oxyhaemoglobin and bilirubin is necessary to accurately diagnose subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in patients with typical symptoms but with negative findings on X-ray examinations. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two methods for interpreting absorption curves; one method from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK-NEQAS) and the other from the national quality assurance programme in Sweden (Equalis). Methods: Consecutive absorbance curves (n=336) were interpreted with two different methods, and their performance was compared to the diagnosis as stated in the patient records. Results: The UK-NEQAS method displayed equal sensitivity to the Equalis method, but the specificity of the UK-NEQAS method was significantly higher than the Equalis method resulting in fewer false positive results. For UK-NEQAS, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84.6% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7% were observed, whereas the Equalis method had a PPV of 27.5% and an NPV of 99.7%. Conclusions: The semi-automated method based on the guidelines from UK-NEQAS provides an efficient and correct interpretation of absorbance curves with short turn-around times. We propose using this method for the routine interpretation of CSF spectrophotometric curves.</p>}},
author = {{Clarin, Marcus and Petersson, Annika and Zetterberg, Henrik and Ekblom, Kim}},
issn = {{1434-6621}},
keywords = {{absorptiometry; cerebrospinal fluid; spectrophotometry; subarachnoid haemorrhage}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
number = {{7}},
pages = {{1053--1057}},
publisher = {{De Gruyter}},
series = {{Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine}},
title = {{Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage with spectrophotometry of cerebrospinal fluid- A comparison of two methods}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1320}},
doi = {{10.1515/cclm-2021-1320}},
volume = {{60}},
year = {{2022}},
}