Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

노인장기요양 현금급여 통제정책에 대한 국가 간 비교연구 : 독일, 스웨덴, 영국을 중심으로

Kim, Hyeji LU ; Choi, Young and Kim, Nam Yeon (2022) In Journal of Community Welfare 81. p.139-186
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze cash-for-care regulatory policies for the elderly long-term care in three countries, Germany, Sweden, and the UK, and to seek policy implications in preparation for regulatory policies that are suitable for the direction of South Korea’s welfare state and the socio-cultural environment. For this purpose, each country’s cash-for-care regulatory policy was analyzed in four different aspects: supplier designation, service provider qualification, use of cash benefit, and professional support. As a result, it was confirmed that cash-for-care regulatory policies of the three countries are being operated differently depending on the institutional and socio-cultural characteristics of each... (More)
The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze cash-for-care regulatory policies for the elderly long-term care in three countries, Germany, Sweden, and the UK, and to seek policy implications in preparation for regulatory policies that are suitable for the direction of South Korea’s welfare state and the socio-cultural environment. For this purpose, each country’s cash-for-care regulatory policy was analyzed in four different aspects: supplier designation, service provider qualification, use of cash benefit, and professional support. As a result, it was confirmed that cash-for-care regulatory policies of the three countries are being operated differently depending on the institutional and socio-cultural characteristics of each country.

Through this analysis, it is suggested to primarily apply the regulatory policy of the Swedish model, which provides support by individual cases, and then to apply the German model, which offers active professional support, in the future when the group of the cash benefit recipient expands. To this end, it is suggested that there should be active discussions for the cash-for-care regulatory policy of South Korea to be prepared in a direction suitable for the policy context and intention of the institution, and ultimately, an official service system through case management should be established. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
alternative title
A comparative study on cash-for-care regulatory policies of long term care system amongst Germany, Sweden and the UK
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Community Welfare
volume
81
pages
48 pages
ISSN
2093-4270
DOI
10.15300/jcw.2022.81.2.139
language
Korean
LU publication?
no
id
770fb5f2-ffd1-43a0-a4cd-b21b9519661a
alternative location
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002845421
date added to LUP
2026-01-25 00:39:30
date last changed
2026-01-26 10:51:34
@article{770fb5f2-ffd1-43a0-a4cd-b21b9519661a,
  abstract     = {{The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze cash-for-care regulatory policies for the elderly long-term care in three countries, Germany, Sweden, and the UK, and to seek policy implications in preparation for regulatory policies that are suitable for the direction of South Korea’s welfare state and the socio-cultural environment. For this purpose, each country’s cash-for-care regulatory policy was analyzed in four different aspects: supplier designation, service provider qualification, use of cash benefit, and professional support. As a result, it was confirmed that cash-for-care regulatory policies of the three countries are being operated differently depending on the institutional and socio-cultural characteristics of each country.<br/><br/>Through this analysis, it is suggested to primarily apply the regulatory policy of the Swedish model, which provides support by individual cases, and then to apply the German model, which offers active professional support, in the future when the group of the cash benefit recipient expands. To this end, it is suggested that there should be active discussions for the cash-for-care regulatory policy of South Korea to be prepared in a direction suitable for the policy context and intention of the institution, and ultimately, an official service system through case management should be established.}},
  author       = {{Kim, Hyeji and Choi, Young and Kim, Nam Yeon}},
  issn         = {{2093-4270}},
  language     = {{kor}},
  pages        = {{139--186}},
  series       = {{Journal of Community Welfare}},
  title        = {{노인장기요양 현금급여 통제정책에 대한 국가 간 비교연구 : 독일, 스웨덴, 영국을 중심으로}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.15300/jcw.2022.81.2.139}},
  doi          = {{10.15300/jcw.2022.81.2.139}},
  volume       = {{81}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}