The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria
(2015) In European Planning Studies 23(9). p.1722-1740- Abstract
- The literature on universities' contributions to regional development is broad and diverse. A precise understanding of how regions may draw advantages from various university activities and the role of public policy institutions in promoting such activities is still missing. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for analysing universities' contributions to regional economic and societal development in differing national contexts and the policy institutions that underpin them. To do this, we review four conceptual models: the entrepreneurial university model, the regional innovation system (RIS) model, the mode 2 university model and the engaged university model. The paper demonstrates that these four models emphasize very... (More)
- The literature on universities' contributions to regional development is broad and diverse. A precise understanding of how regions may draw advantages from various university activities and the role of public policy institutions in promoting such activities is still missing. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for analysing universities' contributions to regional economic and societal development in differing national contexts and the policy institutions that underpin them. To do this, we review four conceptual models: the entrepreneurial university model, the regional innovation system (RIS) model, the mode 2 university model and the engaged university model. The paper demonstrates that these four models emphasize very different activities and outputs by which universities are seen to benefit regional economy and society. It is also shown that these models differ markedly with respect to the policy implications and practice. Analysing some of the public policy imperatives and incentives in the UK, Austria and Sweden, the paper highlights that in the UK, policies encourage all four university models. In contrast, in Sweden and Austria, policy institutions tend to privilege the RIS university model, whilst at the same time, there is some evidence for increasing support of the entrepreneurial university model. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7773620
- author
- Trippl, Michaela LU ; Sinozic, Tanja and Smith, Helen Lawton
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Sweden, Austria, public policy, universities, UK, regional development
- in
- European Planning Studies
- volume
- 23
- issue
- 9
- pages
- 1722 - 1740
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000358412900003
- scopus:84937251464
- ISSN
- 1469-5944
- DOI
- 10.1080/09654313.2015.1052782
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b31fc712-fd40-40f1-80c0-8b5f285db1ed (old id 7773620)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:28:57
- date last changed
- 2024-01-21 15:23:39
@article{b31fc712-fd40-40f1-80c0-8b5f285db1ed,
abstract = {{The literature on universities' contributions to regional development is broad and diverse. A precise understanding of how regions may draw advantages from various university activities and the role of public policy institutions in promoting such activities is still missing. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for analysing universities' contributions to regional economic and societal development in differing national contexts and the policy institutions that underpin them. To do this, we review four conceptual models: the entrepreneurial university model, the regional innovation system (RIS) model, the mode 2 university model and the engaged university model. The paper demonstrates that these four models emphasize very different activities and outputs by which universities are seen to benefit regional economy and society. It is also shown that these models differ markedly with respect to the policy implications and practice. Analysing some of the public policy imperatives and incentives in the UK, Austria and Sweden, the paper highlights that in the UK, policies encourage all four university models. In contrast, in Sweden and Austria, policy institutions tend to privilege the RIS university model, whilst at the same time, there is some evidence for increasing support of the entrepreneurial university model.}},
author = {{Trippl, Michaela and Sinozic, Tanja and Smith, Helen Lawton}},
issn = {{1469-5944}},
keywords = {{Sweden; Austria; public policy; universities; UK; regional development}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{9}},
pages = {{1722--1740}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{European Planning Studies}},
title = {{The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1052782}},
doi = {{10.1080/09654313.2015.1052782}},
volume = {{23}},
year = {{2015}},
}