Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Threshold of tactile perception in a reconstructed auricle.

Öberg, Martin LU ; Svensson, Henry LU ; Becker, Magnus LU orcid and Wikström, Sven-Olof LU (2011) In Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery 45(1). p.23-27
Abstract
Abstract There are more important outcome variables than the aesthetic when it comes to a successful result in reconstruction of the ear for microtia. The protective sensitivity, for example, is important to avoid damage to the skin covering the cartilaginous framework. We studied 39 patients with unilateral microtia and recorded their skin sensitivity more than six months after the last operation. The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test (SWMT) was used to assess the threshold of protective sensitivity in three particular areas: the helix, the anthelix, and the lobule. The opposite ear served as control. A monofilament of 4.31 or less was regarded as acceptable protective sensitivity. Thirty-two patients had acceptable sensitivity in the... (More)
Abstract There are more important outcome variables than the aesthetic when it comes to a successful result in reconstruction of the ear for microtia. The protective sensitivity, for example, is important to avoid damage to the skin covering the cartilaginous framework. We studied 39 patients with unilateral microtia and recorded their skin sensitivity more than six months after the last operation. The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test (SWMT) was used to assess the threshold of protective sensitivity in three particular areas: the helix, the anthelix, and the lobule. The opposite ear served as control. A monofilament of 4.31 or less was regarded as acceptable protective sensitivity. Thirty-two patients had acceptable sensitivity in the whole ear, but the helix gave a poor result in seven patients and in one of them so did the anthelix. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
volume
45
issue
1
pages
23 - 27
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • wos:000288167000005
  • pmid:21446796
  • scopus:79952773466
  • pmid:21446796
ISSN
2000-656X
DOI
10.3109/2000656X.2010.542653
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Surgery Research Unit (013242220), Reconstructive Surgery (013240300)
id
7854b0c5-ea2d-4726-975d-a0ca1ff8e4db (old id 1883324)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21446796?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:07:05
date last changed
2023-09-13 18:20:23
@article{7854b0c5-ea2d-4726-975d-a0ca1ff8e4db,
  abstract     = {{Abstract There are more important outcome variables than the aesthetic when it comes to a successful result in reconstruction of the ear for microtia. The protective sensitivity, for example, is important to avoid damage to the skin covering the cartilaginous framework. We studied 39 patients with unilateral microtia and recorded their skin sensitivity more than six months after the last operation. The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test (SWMT) was used to assess the threshold of protective sensitivity in three particular areas: the helix, the anthelix, and the lobule. The opposite ear served as control. A monofilament of 4.31 or less was regarded as acceptable protective sensitivity. Thirty-two patients had acceptable sensitivity in the whole ear, but the helix gave a poor result in seven patients and in one of them so did the anthelix.}},
  author       = {{Öberg, Martin and Svensson, Henry and Becker, Magnus and Wikström, Sven-Olof}},
  issn         = {{2000-656X}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{23--27}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery}},
  title        = {{Threshold of tactile perception in a reconstructed auricle.}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2010.542653}},
  doi          = {{10.3109/2000656X.2010.542653}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}