Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Revealing the competing mechanisms between land use development and restoration in wetland evolution : an interpretable deep learning approach

Zhang, Zixia ; Zhou, Shenbei ; Duan, Yeqing LU orcid ; Hou, Jiaping and Ning, Jing (2026) In Landscape Ecology 41(8).
Abstract

Context: The spatial competitive relationship between wetland restoration and productive land expansion represents a core challenge in regional land use sustainability. Objectives: This study aims to develop a deep learning framework capable of jointly capturing the spatiotemporal characteristics of land competition. It further seeks to understand changes in the competitive relationship between wetlands and productive land by combining predicted probability distributions with differences in feature contributions. Methods: Using multi-source spatial data for the Yellow River Delta during 2001–2020, this study developed a CNN-LSTM spatiotemporal deep learning framework coupled with a CA-based neighborhood mechanism. Gini impurity and... (More)

Context: The spatial competitive relationship between wetland restoration and productive land expansion represents a core challenge in regional land use sustainability. Objectives: This study aims to develop a deep learning framework capable of jointly capturing the spatiotemporal characteristics of land competition. It further seeks to understand changes in the competitive relationship between wetlands and productive land by combining predicted probability distributions with differences in feature contributions. Methods: Using multi-source spatial data for the Yellow River Delta during 2001–2020, this study developed a CNN-LSTM spatiotemporal deep learning framework coupled with a CA-based neighborhood mechanism. Gini impurity and Integrated Gradients (IG) were introduced to analyze potential competition zones and differences in feature contributions to prediction results. Results: The CNN-LSTM model achieved the best overall performance, with an FoM of 0.1534. The case results showed an overall trade-off pattern between wetlands and productive land. Higher Gini impurity values tended to occur in areas with more interspersed land use and more complex spatial patterns. IG results indicated different patterns of feature dependence in model discrimination. Wetlands were related to natural conditions and historical states, whereas productive land depended more on neighborhood structure and spatial agglomeration, with temporal variation in feature contributions. Conclusions: Competition between wetlands and productive land is neither spatially uniform nor temporally static. It is more concentrated in complex transitional zones and shows different characteristics across stages. The framework developed in this study provides a methodological pathway for research on complex land systems in landscape ecology.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Cellular Automata, Gini impurity, Land competition, Model interpretability, Spatiotemporal deep learning, Wetland restoration
in
Landscape Ecology
volume
41
issue
8
article number
143
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:105046754211
ISSN
0921-2973
DOI
10.1007/s10980-026-02384-1
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2026.
id
7999376d-0b63-45b6-8b05-ee2fe5cd4dab
date added to LUP
2026-09-14 14:40:07
date last changed
2026-09-14 14:41:01
@article{7999376d-0b63-45b6-8b05-ee2fe5cd4dab,
  abstract     = {{<p>Context: The spatial competitive relationship between wetland restoration and productive land expansion represents a core challenge in regional land use sustainability. Objectives: This study aims to develop a deep learning framework capable of jointly capturing the spatiotemporal characteristics of land competition. It further seeks to understand changes in the competitive relationship between wetlands and productive land by combining predicted probability distributions with differences in feature contributions. Methods: Using multi-source spatial data for the Yellow River Delta during 2001–2020, this study developed a CNN-LSTM spatiotemporal deep learning framework coupled with a CA-based neighborhood mechanism. Gini impurity and Integrated Gradients (IG) were introduced to analyze potential competition zones and differences in feature contributions to prediction results. Results: The CNN-LSTM model achieved the best overall performance, with an FoM of 0.1534. The case results showed an overall trade-off pattern between wetlands and productive land. Higher Gini impurity values tended to occur in areas with more interspersed land use and more complex spatial patterns. IG results indicated different patterns of feature dependence in model discrimination. Wetlands were related to natural conditions and historical states, whereas productive land depended more on neighborhood structure and spatial agglomeration, with temporal variation in feature contributions. Conclusions: Competition between wetlands and productive land is neither spatially uniform nor temporally static. It is more concentrated in complex transitional zones and shows different characteristics across stages. The framework developed in this study provides a methodological pathway for research on complex land systems in landscape ecology.</p>}},
  author       = {{Zhang, Zixia and Zhou, Shenbei and Duan, Yeqing and Hou, Jiaping and Ning, Jing}},
  issn         = {{0921-2973}},
  keywords     = {{Cellular Automata; Gini impurity; Land competition; Model interpretability; Spatiotemporal deep learning; Wetland restoration}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Landscape Ecology}},
  title        = {{Revealing the competing mechanisms between land use development and restoration in wetland evolution : an interpretable deep learning approach}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-026-02384-1}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10980-026-02384-1}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}