Misunderstandings about prognosis : an approach for palliative care consultants when the patient does not seem to understand what was said
(2013) In Journal of Palliative Medicine 16(1). p.5-91- Abstract
Called in after discussions about prognosis between referring clinicians and patients, palliative care consultants sometimes find that the patient does not seem to understand what the referring clinician believes he or she explained. However, holding a more explicit discussion about prognosis may compromise the palliative care clinician's rapport with both the patient and the referring clinician. We therefore propose a two-part approach to explore apparent prognostic misunderstandings: first, generate a differential diagnosis for why the patient and referring clinician have different reports of what was said, and second, cultivate a partnership with the referring clinician to provide a unified patient care plan.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/79a9dbd5-bce9-41b7-81a8-07bdcbaff5ed
- author
- Jacobsen, Juliet LU ; Thomas, Jane deLima and Jackson, Vicki A
- publishing date
- 2013-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- keywords
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Communication Barriers, Comprehension, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis, Male, Palliative Care, Problem Solving, Professional-Patient Relations, Prognosis, Referral and Consultation, Terminally Ill/psychology
- in
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- volume
- 16
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 5 - 91
- publisher
- Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84872392910
- pmid:23234301
- ISSN
- 1096-6218
- DOI
- 10.1089/jpm.2012.0142
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 79a9dbd5-bce9-41b7-81a8-07bdcbaff5ed
- date added to LUP
- 2024-11-13 14:17:24
- date last changed
- 2025-05-01 17:32:02
@article{79a9dbd5-bce9-41b7-81a8-07bdcbaff5ed, abstract = {{<p>Called in after discussions about prognosis between referring clinicians and patients, palliative care consultants sometimes find that the patient does not seem to understand what the referring clinician believes he or she explained. However, holding a more explicit discussion about prognosis may compromise the palliative care clinician's rapport with both the patient and the referring clinician. We therefore propose a two-part approach to explore apparent prognostic misunderstandings: first, generate a differential diagnosis for why the patient and referring clinician have different reports of what was said, and second, cultivate a partnership with the referring clinician to provide a unified patient care plan.</p>}}, author = {{Jacobsen, Juliet and Thomas, Jane deLima and Jackson, Vicki A}}, issn = {{1096-6218}}, keywords = {{Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Communication Barriers; Comprehension; Humans; Interprofessional Relations; Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis; Male; Palliative Care; Problem Solving; Professional-Patient Relations; Prognosis; Referral and Consultation; Terminally Ill/psychology}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{5--91}}, publisher = {{Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.}}, series = {{Journal of Palliative Medicine}}, title = {{Misunderstandings about prognosis : an approach for palliative care consultants when the patient does not seem to understand what was said}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0142}}, doi = {{10.1089/jpm.2012.0142}}, volume = {{16}}, year = {{2013}}, }