Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Policy coherence and organizational cultures : Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction targets

Skovgaard, Jakob LU (2018) In Environmental Policy and Governance 28(5). p.350-358
Abstract
This paper addresses coherence at the levels of policy objectives and instruments. The existing literature usually links policy coherence to strong hierarchical coordination mechanisms. This paper builds on two cases of, respectively, hierarchical imposition and deliberation within the European Commission (the step‐up to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction target on the one hand, and the energy efficiency target on the other), to show that coherence of policy objectives is negatively affected by conflicting organizational cultures. The analysis shows, first, that deliberation was possible when the disagreement between organizations was rooted in differing causal beliefs regarding policy instruments, while hierarchical imposition was used when... (More)
This paper addresses coherence at the levels of policy objectives and instruments. The existing literature usually links policy coherence to strong hierarchical coordination mechanisms. This paper builds on two cases of, respectively, hierarchical imposition and deliberation within the European Commission (the step‐up to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction target on the one hand, and the energy efficiency target on the other), to show that coherence of policy objectives is negatively affected by conflicting organizational cultures. The analysis shows, first, that deliberation was possible when the disagreement between organizations was rooted in differing causal beliefs regarding policy instruments, while hierarchical imposition was used when the disagreement was rooted in differences in normative beliefs regarding policy objectives. Secondly, it appears that accommodation between differing causal and normative ideas concerning policy objectives and instruments can be solved both by power and by deliberation, the latter requiring more time and effort. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
bureaucratic politics, EU climate policy, EU energy policy, European Commission, policy coherence, policy instruments, policy objectives
in
Environmental Policy and Governance
volume
28
issue
5
pages
350 - 358
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:85054617893
ISSN
1756-9338
DOI
10.1002/eet.1821
project
Leadership Abandoned? – Explaining the EU’s Position in the Global Climate Change Negotiations 2007-2010
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7b432006-3f32-4e77-b424-4f6f1cf2bd1e
date added to LUP
2018-10-16 15:59:23
date last changed
2022-04-02 02:56:29
@article{7b432006-3f32-4e77-b424-4f6f1cf2bd1e,
  abstract     = {{This paper addresses coherence at the levels of policy objectives and instruments. The existing literature usually links policy coherence to strong hierarchical coordination mechanisms. This paper builds on two cases of, respectively, hierarchical imposition and deliberation within the European Commission (the step‐up to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction target on the one hand, and the energy efficiency target on the other), to show that coherence of policy objectives is negatively affected by conflicting organizational cultures. The analysis shows, first, that deliberation was possible when the disagreement between organizations was rooted in differing causal beliefs regarding policy instruments, while hierarchical imposition was used when the disagreement was rooted in differences in normative beliefs regarding policy objectives. Secondly, it appears that accommodation between differing causal and normative ideas concerning policy objectives and instruments can be solved both by power and by deliberation, the latter requiring more time and effort.}},
  author       = {{Skovgaard, Jakob}},
  issn         = {{1756-9338}},
  keywords     = {{bureaucratic politics; EU climate policy; EU energy policy; European Commission; policy coherence; policy instruments; policy objectives}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{350--358}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Environmental Policy and Governance}},
  title        = {{Policy coherence and organizational cultures : Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction targets}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.1821}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/eet.1821}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}