International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.
(2014) In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 96A. p.65-72- Abstract
- Differences in survivorship of non-posterior-stabilized compared with posterior-stabilized knee designs carry substantial economic consequences, especially with limited health-care resources. However, these comparisons have often been made between relatively small groups of patients, often with short-term follow-up, with only small differences demonstrated between the groups. The goal of this study is to compare the outcomes of non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties with use of a unique collaboration of multiple established knee arthroplasty registries.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4907952
- author
- Comfort, Thomas ; Baste, Valborg ; Froufe, Miquel Angel ; Namba, Robert ; Bordini, Barbara ; Robertsson, Otto LU ; Cafri, Guy ; Paxton, Elizabeth ; Sedrakyan, Art and Graves, Stephen
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
- volume
- 96A
- pages
- 65 - 72
- publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25520421
- wos:000347477000010
- scopus:84924268411
- pmid:25520421
- ISSN
- 1535-1386
- DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.N.00462
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7c3fa438-cb0e-4405-905c-4329d9c1eee9 (old id 4907952)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520421?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:12:06
- date last changed
- 2022-03-05 02:23:14
@article{7c3fa438-cb0e-4405-905c-4329d9c1eee9,
abstract = {{Differences in survivorship of non-posterior-stabilized compared with posterior-stabilized knee designs carry substantial economic consequences, especially with limited health-care resources. However, these comparisons have often been made between relatively small groups of patients, often with short-term follow-up, with only small differences demonstrated between the groups. The goal of this study is to compare the outcomes of non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties with use of a unique collaboration of multiple established knee arthroplasty registries.}},
author = {{Comfort, Thomas and Baste, Valborg and Froufe, Miquel Angel and Namba, Robert and Bordini, Barbara and Robertsson, Otto and Cafri, Guy and Paxton, Elizabeth and Sedrakyan, Art and Graves, Stephen}},
issn = {{1535-1386}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{65--72}},
publisher = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}},
series = {{Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume}},
title = {{International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00462}},
doi = {{10.2106/JBJS.N.00462}},
volume = {{96A}},
year = {{2014}},
}