Advanced

Access: Sidestepping Legitimacy in Deterritorialized Islam. A Preliminary Analysis of the Publications of Islamic Foundation. Paper at Religion, Orientalism, Globalization Workshop, Copenhagen University, Denmark

Janson, Torsten LU (1999)
Abstract (Swedish)
This paper is part a project studying the problem “How is globalization perceived and conceptualized”? Approaching this problem, my contribution to the project aims at an analysis of some of the publications of the British Muslim organization The Islamic Foundation.

A preliminary analysis of the publications suggests the usefulness of a globalization perspective. However, since the perceptions and conceptualizations of globalization present in the publications considerably differ from “mainstream” social scientific definitions, the publications must be regarded as representing responses to globalizations as well as expressions of globalization.

My study is in correspondence with theorists such as Appadurai, Beyer,... (More)
This paper is part a project studying the problem “How is globalization perceived and conceptualized”? Approaching this problem, my contribution to the project aims at an analysis of some of the publications of the British Muslim organization The Islamic Foundation.

A preliminary analysis of the publications suggests the usefulness of a globalization perspective. However, since the perceptions and conceptualizations of globalization present in the publications considerably differ from “mainstream” social scientific definitions, the publications must be regarded as representing responses to globalizations as well as expressions of globalization.

My study is in correspondence with theorists such as Appadurai, Beyer, Hannerz, Meyer, Robertson and Turner, pointing to the fact that globalization comes to expression in localized, particular forms, that in no way bring about any “homogenous global culture”. Still, the particularizing tendency itself seems to follow a universal pattern, or in the words of Robertson, the interpenetration of the universalization of particularism and the particularization of universalism. The analysis points to some cases where such a dynamic particular/universal seems to be at work, constraining as well as facilitating the activities of The Islamic Foundation..

In sum, the transnational profile of the organization’s publications, structures and local activities display a conspicuous adjustability to present conditions. By force of its mass-communicational infrastructures and discursive “bilinguality”, The Islamic Foundation seems to be as much at home in the Muslim normative text cultures, as in the “Western” sciences, bureaucracies, techniques, consumer markets and policies. Such abilities have granted The Islamic Foundation a position in the British society that outmatches its “social mandate”, and thus the opportunity of sidestepping the question of social or theological representativity and legitimacy.

In studies of the current debates on Islam, scholars have pointed to precisely the quest for legitimacy in interpreting Islam, competing about the establishment of the “correct tradition of Islam“, as the key-note dynamic of such debates. Partly contradicting this view, the present analysis suggests that more importantly than claiming legitimacy, The Islamic Foundation has direct access to vital socio-religious functions, due to its adaptability to present preconditions. Therefore, The Islamic Foundation seems to afford a social as well as a theological marginality and “illegitimacy“, and still maintain a position in the debates - at least in the short run. (Less)
Abstract
This paper is part a project studying the problem “How is globalization perceived and conceptualized”? Approaching this problem, my contribution to the project aims at an analysis of some of the publications of the British Muslim organization The Islamic Foundation.

A preliminary analysis of the publications suggests the usefulness of a globalization perspective. However, since the perceptions and conceptualizations of globalization present in the publications considerably differ from “mainstream” social scientific definitions, the publications must be regarded as representing responses to globalizations as well as expressions of globalization.

My study is in correspondence with theorists such as Appadurai, Beyer,... (More)
This paper is part a project studying the problem “How is globalization perceived and conceptualized”? Approaching this problem, my contribution to the project aims at an analysis of some of the publications of the British Muslim organization The Islamic Foundation.

A preliminary analysis of the publications suggests the usefulness of a globalization perspective. However, since the perceptions and conceptualizations of globalization present in the publications considerably differ from “mainstream” social scientific definitions, the publications must be regarded as representing responses to globalizations as well as expressions of globalization.

My study is in correspondence with theorists such as Appadurai, Beyer, Hannerz, Meyer, Robertson and Turner, pointing to the fact that globalization comes to expression in localized, particular forms, that in no way bring about any “homogenous global culture”. Still, the particularizing tendency itself seems to follow a universal pattern, or in the words of Robertson, the interpenetration of the universalization of particularism and the particularization of universalism. The analysis points to some cases where such a dynamic particular/universal seems to be at work, constraining as well as facilitating the activities of The Islamic Foundation..

In sum, the transnational profile of the organization’s publications, structures and local activities display a conspicuous adjustability to present conditions. By force of its mass-communicational infrastructures and discursive “bilinguality”, The Islamic Foundation seems to be as much at home in the Muslim normative text cultures, as in the “Western” sciences, bureaucracies, techniques, consumer markets and policies. Such abilities have granted The Islamic Foundation a position in the British society that outmatches its “social mandate”, and thus the opportunity of sidestepping the question of social or theological representativity and legitimacy.

In studies of the current debates on Islam, scholars have pointed to precisely the quest for legitimacy in interpreting Islam, competing about the establishment of the “correct tradition of Islam“, as the key-note dynamic of such debates. Partly contradicting this view, the present analysis suggests that more importantly than claiming legitimacy, The Islamic Foundation has direct access to vital socio-religious functions, due to its adaptability to present preconditions. Therefore, The Islamic Foundation seems to afford a social as well as a theological marginality and “illegitimacy“, and still maintain a position in the debates - at least in the short run. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
published
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7cf7a2e5-8296-4746-b826-839918fc2b7a
date added to LUP
2017-05-18 14:30:58
date last changed
2017-05-30 12:00:26
@misc{7cf7a2e5-8296-4746-b826-839918fc2b7a,
  abstract     = {This paper is part a project studying the problem “How is globalization perceived and conceptualized”? Approaching this problem, my contribution to the project aims at an analysis of some of the publications of the British Muslim organization The Islamic Foundation.<br/><br/>A preliminary analysis of the publications suggests the usefulness of a globalization perspective. However, since the perceptions and conceptualizations of globalization present in the publications considerably differ from “mainstream” social scientific definitions, the publications must be regarded as representing responses to globalizations as well as expressions of globalization. <br/><br/>My study is in correspondence with theorists such as Appadurai, Beyer, Hannerz, Meyer, Robertson and Turner, pointing to the fact that globalization comes to expression in localized, particular forms, that in no way bring about any “homogenous global culture”. Still, the particularizing tendency itself seems to follow a universal pattern, or in the words of Robertson, the interpenetration of the universalization of particularism and the particularization of universalism. The analysis points to some cases where such a dynamic particular/universal seems to be at work, constraining as well as facilitating the activities of The Islamic Foundation.. <br/><br/>In sum, the transnational profile of the organization’s publications, structures and local activities display a conspicuous adjustability to present conditions. By force of its mass-communicational infrastructures and discursive “bilinguality”, The Islamic Foundation seems to be as much at home in the Muslim normative text cultures, as in the “Western” sciences, bureaucracies, techniques, consumer markets and policies. Such abilities have granted The Islamic Foundation a position in the British society that outmatches its “social mandate”, and thus the opportunity of sidestepping the question of social or theological representativity and legitimacy. <br/><br/>In studies of the current debates on Islam, scholars have pointed to precisely the quest for legitimacy in interpreting Islam, competing about the establishment of the “correct tradition of Islam“, as the key-note dynamic of such debates. Partly contradicting this view, the present analysis suggests that more importantly than claiming legitimacy, The Islamic Foundation has direct access to vital socio-religious functions, due to its adaptability to present preconditions. Therefore, The Islamic Foundation seems to afford a social as well as a theological marginality and “illegitimacy“, and still maintain a position in the debates - at least in the short run.},
  author       = {Janson, Torsten},
  language     = {eng},
  title        = {Access: Sidestepping Legitimacy in Deterritorialized Islam. A Preliminary Analysis of the Publications of Islamic Foundation. Paper at Religion, Orientalism, Globalization Workshop, Copenhagen University, Denmark},
  year         = {1999},
}