A Cross-Sectional Study of Circadian Stimulus in Swedish Radiographers’ Light Environment
(2025) In Health Environments Research & Design Journal 18(1). p.59-69- Abstract
- Timely light exposure is a vital aspect to achieve better sleep and well-being. As there are risks with a disturbed circadian rhythm and benefits with light settings that stimulate the rhythm, the circadian effective light, circadian stimulus (CS), for radiographers was examined. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare radiographers’ light environment on the workstations, at a university hospital in Southern Sweden in the form of CS and relate that to recommendations published by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Method: A cross-sectional method has been applied. The measurements for CS were collected in all labs in the radiology department in the middle of January. Result: A total of 804 measures were evenly collected... (More)
- Timely light exposure is a vital aspect to achieve better sleep and well-being. As there are risks with a disturbed circadian rhythm and benefits with light settings that stimulate the rhythm, the circadian effective light, circadian stimulus (CS), for radiographers was examined. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare radiographers’ light environment on the workstations, at a university hospital in Southern Sweden in the form of CS and relate that to recommendations published by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Method: A cross-sectional method has been applied. The measurements for CS were collected in all labs in the radiology department in the middle of January. Result: A total of 804 measures were evenly collected resulting in a median for the 19 labs, where the observed median for all labs was 0.091 CS which is significantly lower than the recommended value of 0.3 CS (p < .001). Comparing work light settings with maximum light levels in the brightest and darkest labs showed a significant difference (p < .001). Conclusion: The CS values in the labs, at the radiology department at a university hospital in Southern Sweden, do not reach the recommended values of circadian stimulus published by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency when the radiographers themselves set the light. There is a potential for improvement as a significant difference could be seen between the chosen level of light and the maximum possible level of light. (Less)
- Abstract (Swedish)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8039d1ac-6a10-43e2-b316-32003afd0d38
- author
- Viseu, Camilla Krahmer Anes LU and Selvander, Madeleine LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Health Environments Research & Design Journal
- volume
- 18
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 59 - 69
- publisher
- Center for Health Design
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85203979008
- pmid:39262317
- ISSN
- 2167-5112
- DOI
- 10.1177/19375867241278599
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 8039d1ac-6a10-43e2-b316-32003afd0d38
- date added to LUP
- 2024-12-09 13:23:48
- date last changed
- 2025-01-21 11:52:44
@article{8039d1ac-6a10-43e2-b316-32003afd0d38, abstract = {{Timely light exposure is a vital aspect to achieve better sleep and well-being. As there are risks with a disturbed circadian rhythm and benefits with light settings that stimulate the rhythm, the circadian effective light, circadian stimulus (CS), for radiographers was examined. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare radiographers’ light environment on the workstations, at a university hospital in Southern Sweden in the form of CS and relate that to recommendations published by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Method: A cross-sectional method has been applied. The measurements for CS were collected in all labs in the radiology department in the middle of January. Result: A total of 804 measures were evenly collected resulting in a median for the 19 labs, where the observed median for all labs was 0.091 CS which is significantly lower than the recommended value of 0.3 CS (p < .001). Comparing work light settings with maximum light levels in the brightest and darkest labs showed a significant difference (p < .001). Conclusion: The CS values in the labs, at the radiology department at a university hospital in Southern Sweden, do not reach the recommended values of circadian stimulus published by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency when the radiographers themselves set the light. There is a potential for improvement as a significant difference could be seen between the chosen level of light and the maximum possible level of light.}}, author = {{Viseu, Camilla Krahmer Anes and Selvander, Madeleine}}, issn = {{2167-5112}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{59--69}}, publisher = {{Center for Health Design}}, series = {{Health Environments Research & Design Journal}}, title = {{A Cross-Sectional Study of Circadian Stimulus in Swedish Radiographers’ Light Environment}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19375867241278599}}, doi = {{10.1177/19375867241278599}}, volume = {{18}}, year = {{2025}}, }