Insects modify their behaviour depending on the feedback sensor used when walking on a trackball in virtual-reality
(2015) In Journal of Experimental Biology 218. p.3118-3127- Abstract
- When using virtual-reality paradigms to study animal behaviour, careful attention must be paid to how the animal's actions are detected. This is particularly relevant in closed-loop experiments where the animal interacts with a stimulus. Many different sensor types have been used to measure aspects of behaviour, and although some sensors may be more accurate than others, few studies have examined whether, and how, such differences affect an animal's behaviour in a closed-loop experiment. To investigate this issue, we conducted experiments with tethered honeybees walking on an air-supported trackball and fixating a visual object in closed-loop. Bees walked faster and along straighter paths when the motion of the trackball was measured in... (More)
- When using virtual-reality paradigms to study animal behaviour, careful attention must be paid to how the animal's actions are detected. This is particularly relevant in closed-loop experiments where the animal interacts with a stimulus. Many different sensor types have been used to measure aspects of behaviour, and although some sensors may be more accurate than others, few studies have examined whether, and how, such differences affect an animal's behaviour in a closed-loop experiment. To investigate this issue, we conducted experiments with tethered honeybees walking on an air-supported trackball and fixating a visual object in closed-loop. Bees walked faster and along straighter paths when the motion of the trackball was measured in the classical fashion - using optical motion sensors repurposed from computer mice - than when measured more accurately using a computer vision algorithm called 'FicTrac'. When computer mouse sensors were used to measure bees' behaviour, the bees modified their behaviour and achieved improved control of the stimulus. This behavioural change appears to be a response to a systematic error in the computer mouse sensor that reduces the sensitivity of this sensor system under certain conditions. Although the large perceived inertia and mass of the trackball relative to the honeybee is a limitation of tethered walking paradigms, observing differences depending on the sensor system used to measure bee behaviour was not expected. This study suggests that bees are capable of fine-tuning their motor control to improve the outcome of the task they are performing. Further, our findings show that caution is required when designing virtual-reality experiments, as animals can potentially respond to the artificial scenario in unexpected and unintended ways. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8054657
- author
- Taylor, Gavin LU ; Paulk, Angelique C ; Pearson, Thomas WJ ; Moore, Richard JD ; Stacey, Jacqui A ; Ball, David ; van Swinderen, Bruno and Srinivasan, Mandyam V
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- volume
- 218
- pages
- 3118 - 3127
- publisher
- The Company of Biologists Ltd
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84962892169
- pmid:26276861
- ISSN
- 1477-9145
- DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.125617
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 1f3a6d8e-8532-4273-aa17-2ad64e3c6d0f (old id 8054657)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 08:52:34
- date last changed
- 2022-01-29 07:22:30
@article{1f3a6d8e-8532-4273-aa17-2ad64e3c6d0f, abstract = {{When using virtual-reality paradigms to study animal behaviour, careful attention must be paid to how the animal's actions are detected. This is particularly relevant in closed-loop experiments where the animal interacts with a stimulus. Many different sensor types have been used to measure aspects of behaviour, and although some sensors may be more accurate than others, few studies have examined whether, and how, such differences affect an animal's behaviour in a closed-loop experiment. To investigate this issue, we conducted experiments with tethered honeybees walking on an air-supported trackball and fixating a visual object in closed-loop. Bees walked faster and along straighter paths when the motion of the trackball was measured in the classical fashion - using optical motion sensors repurposed from computer mice - than when measured more accurately using a computer vision algorithm called 'FicTrac'. When computer mouse sensors were used to measure bees' behaviour, the bees modified their behaviour and achieved improved control of the stimulus. This behavioural change appears to be a response to a systematic error in the computer mouse sensor that reduces the sensitivity of this sensor system under certain conditions. Although the large perceived inertia and mass of the trackball relative to the honeybee is a limitation of tethered walking paradigms, observing differences depending on the sensor system used to measure bee behaviour was not expected. This study suggests that bees are capable of fine-tuning their motor control to improve the outcome of the task they are performing. Further, our findings show that caution is required when designing virtual-reality experiments, as animals can potentially respond to the artificial scenario in unexpected and unintended ways.}}, author = {{Taylor, Gavin and Paulk, Angelique C and Pearson, Thomas WJ and Moore, Richard JD and Stacey, Jacqui A and Ball, David and van Swinderen, Bruno and Srinivasan, Mandyam V}}, issn = {{1477-9145}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{3118--3127}}, publisher = {{The Company of Biologists Ltd}}, series = {{Journal of Experimental Biology}}, title = {{Insects modify their behaviour depending on the feedback sensor used when walking on a trackball in virtual-reality}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.125617}}, doi = {{10.1242/jeb.125617}}, volume = {{218}}, year = {{2015}}, }