Nonconceptual content and the distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge
Brinck, Ingar LU
(1999)
In Behavioral and Brain Sciences
22(5).
p.760-761
- Abstract
- A subject may be in a state with nonconceptual content without having the concepts that describe the state. Nonconceptual content does not seem to be a clear-cut case of either implicit or explicit knowledge. It underlies a kind of practical knowledge that is not reducible to procedural knowledge, and is accessible to the subject and under voluntary control.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/810175
- author
- Brinck, Ingar
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 1999
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- volume
- 22
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 760 - 761
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:0033387829
- ISSN
- 1469-1825
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ddeca656-295f-49fc-85a5-c3475f93b51b (old id 810175)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:06:11
- date last changed
- 2022-01-28 17:17:19
@article{ddeca656-295f-49fc-85a5-c3475f93b51b,
abstract = {{A subject may be in a state with nonconceptual content without having the concepts that describe the state. Nonconceptual content does not seem to be a clear-cut case of either implicit or explicit knowledge. It underlies a kind of practical knowledge that is not reducible to procedural knowledge, and is accessible to the subject and under voluntary control.}},
author = {{Brinck, Ingar}},
issn = {{1469-1825}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{760--761}},
publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}},
series = {{Behavioral and Brain Sciences}},
title = {{Nonconceptual content and the distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/4568423/2303404.pdf}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{1999}},
}