Family structure in the Siberian Jay as revealed by microsatellite analyses
(2003) In The Condor: ornithological applications 105(3). p.505-514- Abstract
- The Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) lives in resident, territorial family groups outside the breeding season, but does not breed cooperatively. Thereby it offers an opportunity to study the evolution of territorial group living, without confounding effects of reproductive cooperation. During a long-term study in Finland 1974-2000, we observed Siberian Jay group composition in autumn. Using microsatellite analysis based on feather or blood samples we clarified kin relations within the groups. We found that out of 311 groups that included at least one more individual than the territory holders, 74% were nuclear families, including breeding birds and 1-3 retained offspring. However, 26% of the groups were not families, but consisted of... (More)
- The Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) lives in resident, territorial family groups outside the breeding season, but does not breed cooperatively. Thereby it offers an opportunity to study the evolution of territorial group living, without confounding effects of reproductive cooperation. During a long-term study in Finland 1974-2000, we observed Siberian Jay group composition in autumn. Using microsatellite analysis based on feather or blood samples we clarified kin relations within the groups. We found that out of 311 groups that included at least one more individual than the territory holders, 74% were nuclear families, including breeding birds and 1-3 retained offspring. However, 26% of the groups were not families, but consisted of pairs accompanied only by individuals that were not their offspring. According to extensive pedigrees we found that 70% of the 82 immatures associated with a nonparent pair were not related to either territory holder. Of these 82 immatures, 91% were associated with pairs that had no offspring on their own, suggesting that they were failed breeders or newly established pairs. The composition of groups was mostly unchanged during the observation period within each season, regardless of kinship. Previous studies have reported apparent nepotism between parents and retained offspring in the Siberian Jay, and a high degree of aggression toward nonoffspring, so we did not expect to find such high frequency and remarkable within-season stability of nonfamily groups. These observations suggest that there are important fitness benefits to gain from territoriality and group living, regardless of kinship. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/137225
- author
- Lillandt, B G ; Bensch, Staffan LU and von Schantz, Torbjörn LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2003
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- The Condor: ornithological applications
- volume
- 105
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 505 - 514
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000184561100010
- scopus:0043131893
- ISSN
- 0010-5422
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 81f8e0ab-00aa-48b6-ab36-47894a67b681 (old id 137225)
- alternative location
- http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-abstract&issn=0010-5422&volume=105&issue=03&page=0505
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 15:38:00
- date last changed
- 2024-01-10 17:40:34
@article{81f8e0ab-00aa-48b6-ab36-47894a67b681,
abstract = {{The Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) lives in resident, territorial family groups outside the breeding season, but does not breed cooperatively. Thereby it offers an opportunity to study the evolution of territorial group living, without confounding effects of reproductive cooperation. During a long-term study in Finland 1974-2000, we observed Siberian Jay group composition in autumn. Using microsatellite analysis based on feather or blood samples we clarified kin relations within the groups. We found that out of 311 groups that included at least one more individual than the territory holders, 74% were nuclear families, including breeding birds and 1-3 retained offspring. However, 26% of the groups were not families, but consisted of pairs accompanied only by individuals that were not their offspring. According to extensive pedigrees we found that 70% of the 82 immatures associated with a nonparent pair were not related to either territory holder. Of these 82 immatures, 91% were associated with pairs that had no offspring on their own, suggesting that they were failed breeders or newly established pairs. The composition of groups was mostly unchanged during the observation period within each season, regardless of kinship. Previous studies have reported apparent nepotism between parents and retained offspring in the Siberian Jay, and a high degree of aggression toward nonoffspring, so we did not expect to find such high frequency and remarkable within-season stability of nonfamily groups. These observations suggest that there are important fitness benefits to gain from territoriality and group living, regardless of kinship.}},
author = {{Lillandt, B G and Bensch, Staffan and von Schantz, Torbjörn}},
issn = {{0010-5422}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{505--514}},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
series = {{The Condor: ornithological applications}},
title = {{Family structure in the Siberian Jay as revealed by microsatellite analyses}},
url = {{http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-abstract&issn=0010-5422&volume=105&issue=03&page=0505}},
volume = {{105}},
year = {{2003}},
}