In the name of king, country, and people on the Westminster model and Bhutan's constitutional transition
(2015) In Democratization 22(7). p.1338-1361- Abstract
- In 2008 Bhutan inaugurated a written constitution thereby instituting the state as a constitutional monarchy. The constitution is almost unanimously described as democratic by international media and academics. The ease with which this apparent consensus on its democratic character has been achieved, however, raises the important question of how best to approach the theory of constitutional democratization. In approaching the issue of democratization as a move towards popular control, this article discusses the ambivalence of the Bhutanese constitution towards this principle in a cultural context where social order is seen as constituted within the unity of king, country, and people. Curiously, this language is not as unique to Bhutan as... (More)
- In 2008 Bhutan inaugurated a written constitution thereby instituting the state as a constitutional monarchy. The constitution is almost unanimously described as democratic by international media and academics. The ease with which this apparent consensus on its democratic character has been achieved, however, raises the important question of how best to approach the theory of constitutional democratization. In approaching the issue of democratization as a move towards popular control, this article discusses the ambivalence of the Bhutanese constitution towards this principle in a cultural context where social order is seen as constituted within the unity of king, country, and people. Curiously, this language is not as unique to Bhutan as one might expect, but influenced by the Westminster legacy in its emphasis on the principle of Crown in Parliament, its ritualization, and ideas of political inequality. It raises the question whether this model is suitable as a blueprint model for countries with different historic and cultural trajectories from the European ones? The article advocates a novel approach to the analysis of constitutional transition that transgresses the dichotomy between an institutional and linguistic approach, thus opening up interesting new insights on the waxing and waning of processes of expanding popular control. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8220817
- author
- Bothe, Winnie LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bhutan, popular control, constitutional transition, constitutional, language, "Crown in Parliament"
- in
- Democratization
- volume
- 22
- issue
- 7
- pages
- 1338 - 1361
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000362174200009
- scopus:84954028460
- ISSN
- 1351-0347
- DOI
- 10.1080/13510347.2014.959437
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e822e8bb-6a95-4e94-acaf-1723bd06d0ee (old id 8220817)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 14:01:16
- date last changed
- 2022-03-14 03:16:46
@article{e822e8bb-6a95-4e94-acaf-1723bd06d0ee,
abstract = {{In 2008 Bhutan inaugurated a written constitution thereby instituting the state as a constitutional monarchy. The constitution is almost unanimously described as democratic by international media and academics. The ease with which this apparent consensus on its democratic character has been achieved, however, raises the important question of how best to approach the theory of constitutional democratization. In approaching the issue of democratization as a move towards popular control, this article discusses the ambivalence of the Bhutanese constitution towards this principle in a cultural context where social order is seen as constituted within the unity of king, country, and people. Curiously, this language is not as unique to Bhutan as one might expect, but influenced by the Westminster legacy in its emphasis on the principle of Crown in Parliament, its ritualization, and ideas of political inequality. It raises the question whether this model is suitable as a blueprint model for countries with different historic and cultural trajectories from the European ones? The article advocates a novel approach to the analysis of constitutional transition that transgresses the dichotomy between an institutional and linguistic approach, thus opening up interesting new insights on the waxing and waning of processes of expanding popular control.}},
author = {{Bothe, Winnie}},
issn = {{1351-0347}},
keywords = {{Bhutan; popular control; constitutional transition; constitutional; language; "Crown in Parliament"}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{7}},
pages = {{1338--1361}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Democratization}},
title = {{In the name of king, country, and people on the Westminster model and Bhutan's constitutional transition}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.959437}},
doi = {{10.1080/13510347.2014.959437}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{2015}},
}