Fixationstechniken bei der Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris : Prinzipien, operative Techniken und Komplikationen
(2019) In Orthopade 48(8). p.659-667- Abstract
The purpose of this review is to present the pros and cons as well as the surgical techniques of conventional implants used for fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Worth mentioning are K‑wires, Hansson pins, transfixing screws, and gliding screws. We searched PubMed for “ECF” and “SCFE” in combination with “in situ fixation,” “pin,” “wire,” “screw,” and “nail.” We considered Johansson nail, Knowles pin, and Nyström nail to be obsolete and of historical interest only. We noticed a trend from absolute stability towards some form of dynamic fixation over time, likely related to considerations of growth disturbance of the proximal femur and also the inherent potential for remodeling with time.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/824d1fb3-412b-4b2e-8497-cf99aea91157
- author
- Lederer, C. ; Hosalkar, H. S. ; Tiderius, C. J. LU ; Westhoff, B. ; Bittersohl, B. and Krauspe, R.
- alternative title
- Fixation techniques for slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Principles, surgical techniques, and complications
- publishing date
- 2019-05-22
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bone screws, Femoroacetabular impingement, Femur, Kirschner wires, SCFE
- in
- Orthopade
- volume
- 48
- issue
- 8
- pages
- 659 - 667
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:31119306
- scopus:85066914411
- ISSN
- 0085-4530
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00132-019-03733-6
- language
- German
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 824d1fb3-412b-4b2e-8497-cf99aea91157
- date added to LUP
- 2019-06-24 12:44:13
- date last changed
- 2024-05-28 17:41:53
@article{824d1fb3-412b-4b2e-8497-cf99aea91157,
abstract = {{<p>The purpose of this review is to present the pros and cons as well as the surgical techniques of conventional implants used for fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Worth mentioning are K‑wires, Hansson pins, transfixing screws, and gliding screws. We searched PubMed for “ECF” and “SCFE” in combination with “in situ fixation,” “pin,” “wire,” “screw,” and “nail.” We considered Johansson nail, Knowles pin, and Nyström nail to be obsolete and of historical interest only. We noticed a trend from absolute stability towards some form of dynamic fixation over time, likely related to considerations of growth disturbance of the proximal femur and also the inherent potential for remodeling with time.</p>}},
author = {{Lederer, C. and Hosalkar, H. S. and Tiderius, C. J. and Westhoff, B. and Bittersohl, B. and Krauspe, R.}},
issn = {{0085-4530}},
keywords = {{Bone screws; Femoroacetabular impingement; Femur; Kirschner wires; SCFE}},
language = {{ger}},
month = {{05}},
number = {{8}},
pages = {{659--667}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Orthopade}},
title = {{Fixationstechniken bei der Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris : Prinzipien, operative Techniken und Komplikationen}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-019-03733-6}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00132-019-03733-6}},
volume = {{48}},
year = {{2019}},
}