Consistency and shifts in Gettier cases
Stephens, Andreas LU
(2021)
In Logos & Episteme: an international journal of epistemiology
12(3).
p.331-343
- Abstract
- Two Gettier cases are described in detail and it is shown how they unfold in terms of reflective and reflexive desiderata. It is argued that the Gettier problem does not pose a problem for conceptions of knowledge as long as we are consistent in how we understand justification and knowledge. It is only by reading the cases with a reflective understanding of justification but a reflexive understanding of knowledge, without acknowledging that this takes place, that the cases become ‘problems.’
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/844a2f90-8612-4b51-81b4-d0190955d7b2
- author
- Stephens, Andreas
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021-09
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Gettier, Knowledge, Justification, Intuition, Reflective processes, reflexive processes, consistency
- in
- Logos & Episteme: an international journal of epistemiology
- volume
- 12
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 13 pages
- publisher
- Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85118160429
- ISSN
- 2069-0533
- DOI
- 10.5840/logos-episteme202112324
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 844a2f90-8612-4b51-81b4-d0190955d7b2
- date added to LUP
- 2021-10-05 12:23:15
- date last changed
- 2022-04-27 04:26:45
@article{844a2f90-8612-4b51-81b4-d0190955d7b2,
abstract = {{Two Gettier cases are described in detail and it is shown how they unfold in terms of reflective and reflexive desiderata. It is argued that the Gettier problem does not pose a problem for conceptions of knowledge as long as we are consistent in how we understand justification and knowledge. It is only by reading the cases with a reflective understanding of justification but a reflexive understanding of knowledge, without acknowledging that this takes place, that the cases become ‘problems.’}},
author = {{Stephens, Andreas}},
issn = {{2069-0533}},
keywords = {{Gettier; Knowledge; Justification; Intuition; Reflective processes; reflexive processes; consistency}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{331--343}},
publisher = {{Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch}},
series = {{Logos & Episteme: an international journal of epistemiology}},
title = {{Consistency and shifts in Gettier cases}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112324}},
doi = {{10.5840/logos-episteme202112324}},
volume = {{12}},
year = {{2021}},
}