A hardware efficiency analysis for simplified trellis decoding blocks
(2005) IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems - Design and Implementation (SiPS) 2005. p.128-132- Abstract
- Two simplifications for trellis decoding blocks are analyzed in terms of hardware efficiency. Both architectures use a complementary property of the best rate 1/n convolutional codes to reduce arithmetic complexity. While the reduction can be calculated straightforward in the first approach (17%), the other approach relies on modified computational operations and hence this reduction is not as evident. It is shown that for rate 1/2 codes the first approach is preferable for hardware implementation in terms of area and speed.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/615620
- author
- Kamuf, Matthias LU ; Öwall, Viktor LU and Anderson, John B LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2005
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Trellis decoding blocks, Computational operations, Hardware efficiency
- host publication
- [Host publication title missing]
- volume
- 2005
- pages
- 128 - 132
- publisher
- IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- conference name
- IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems - Design and Implementation (SiPS)
- conference location
- Athens, Greece
- conference dates
- 2005-11-02 - 2005-11-04
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000236758900023
- scopus:33846986763
- ISSN
- 1520-6130
- ISBN
- 0-7803-9333-3
- DOI
- 10.1109/SIPS.2005.1579851
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 85a9bb57-e15b-40f2-ba8c-fb669b881a42 (old id 615620)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:46:17
- date last changed
- 2022-01-28 22:01:23
@inproceedings{85a9bb57-e15b-40f2-ba8c-fb669b881a42, abstract = {{Two simplifications for trellis decoding blocks are analyzed in terms of hardware efficiency. Both architectures use a complementary property of the best rate 1/n convolutional codes to reduce arithmetic complexity. While the reduction can be calculated straightforward in the first approach (17%), the other approach relies on modified computational operations and hence this reduction is not as evident. It is shown that for rate 1/2 codes the first approach is preferable for hardware implementation in terms of area and speed.}}, author = {{Kamuf, Matthias and Öwall, Viktor and Anderson, John B}}, booktitle = {{[Host publication title missing]}}, isbn = {{0-7803-9333-3}}, issn = {{1520-6130}}, keywords = {{Trellis decoding blocks; Computational operations; Hardware efficiency}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{128--132}}, publisher = {{IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.}}, title = {{A hardware efficiency analysis for simplified trellis decoding blocks}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIPS.2005.1579851}}, doi = {{10.1109/SIPS.2005.1579851}}, volume = {{2005}}, year = {{2005}}, }