Persistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery
(2025) In Molecular Ecology- Abstract
Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four... (More)
Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.
(Less)
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- keywords
- captive breeding, conservation genetics, genomic erosion, population genetics—empirical, whooping crane
- in
- Molecular Ecology
- article number
- e70088
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105014121129
- pmid:40856093
- ISSN
- 0962-1083
- DOI
- 10.1111/mec.70088
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 86235596-5b81-466b-b617-cf517afeced3
- date added to LUP
- 2025-11-17 13:10:27
- date last changed
- 2025-11-24 10:58:45
@article{86235596-5b81-466b-b617-cf517afeced3,
abstract = {{<p>Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.</p>}},
author = {{Fontsere, Claudia and Speak, Samuel A. and Caven, Andrew J. and Rodríguez, Juan Antonio and Wang, Xuejing and Pacheco, Carolina and Cassatt-Johnstone, Molly and Femerling, Georgette and Maloney, Brigid and Balacco, Jennifer and Collins, Joanna and Sims, Ying and Abueg, Linelle and Fedrigo, Olivier and Jarvis, Erich D. and Hartup, Barry K. and Shapiro, Beth and Gilbert, M. Thomas P. and van Oosterhout, Cock and Morales, Hernán E.}},
issn = {{0962-1083}},
keywords = {{captive breeding; conservation genetics; genomic erosion; population genetics—empirical; whooping crane}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Molecular Ecology}},
title = {{Persistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.70088}},
doi = {{10.1111/mec.70088}},
year = {{2025}},
}
