Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A non-classical route of efficient plant uptake verified with fluorescent nanoparticles and root adhesion forces investigated using AFM

Sharma, Sandeep ; Muddassir, Mohd ; Muthusamy, Saraladevi LU ; Vaishnav, Pardeep Kumar ; Singh, Manish LU ; Sharma, Deepak ; Kanagarajan, Selvaraju and Shanmugam, Vijayakumar (2020) In Scientific Reports 10(1).
Abstract

Classical plant uptake is limited to hydrophilic or water-dispersible material. Therefore, in order to test the uptake behaviour of hydrophobic particles, here, we tested the fate of hydrophobic particles (oleylamine coated Cu2-xSe NPs (CS@OA)) in comparison to hydrophilic particles (chitosan-coated Cu2-xSe NPs (CS@CH)) by treatment on the plant roots. Surprisingly, hydrophobic CS@OA NPs have been found to be ~ 1.3 times more efficient than hydrophilic CS@CH NPs in tomato plant root penetration. An atomic force microscopy (AFM) adhesion force experiment confirms that hydrophobic NPs experience non-spontaneous yet energetically favorable root trapping and penetration. Further, a relative difference in the... (More)

Classical plant uptake is limited to hydrophilic or water-dispersible material. Therefore, in order to test the uptake behaviour of hydrophobic particles, here, we tested the fate of hydrophobic particles (oleylamine coated Cu2-xSe NPs (CS@OA)) in comparison to hydrophilic particles (chitosan-coated Cu2-xSe NPs (CS@CH)) by treatment on the plant roots. Surprisingly, hydrophobic CS@OA NPs have been found to be ~ 1.3 times more efficient than hydrophilic CS@CH NPs in tomato plant root penetration. An atomic force microscopy (AFM) adhesion force experiment confirms that hydrophobic NPs experience non-spontaneous yet energetically favorable root trapping and penetration. Further, a relative difference in the hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic NPs movement from roots to shoots has been observed and found related to the change in protein corona as identified by two dimensional-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) analysis. Finally, the toxicity assays at the give concentration showed that Cu2-xSe NPs lead to non-significant toxicity as compared to control. This technology may find an advantage in fertilizer application.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Scientific Reports
volume
10
issue
1
article number
19233
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • pmid:33159139
  • scopus:85095681280
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/s41598-020-75685-3
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
865dd8c4-357f-4a57-8a24-cf6194c439e9
date added to LUP
2020-11-23 15:01:36
date last changed
2024-04-17 19:31:00
@article{865dd8c4-357f-4a57-8a24-cf6194c439e9,
  abstract     = {{<p>Classical plant uptake is limited to hydrophilic or water-dispersible material. Therefore, in order to test the uptake behaviour of hydrophobic particles, here, we tested the fate of hydrophobic particles (oleylamine coated Cu<sub>2-x</sub>Se NPs (CS@OA)) in comparison to hydrophilic particles (chitosan-coated Cu<sub>2-x</sub>Se NPs (CS@CH)) by treatment on the plant roots. Surprisingly, hydrophobic CS@OA NPs have been found to be ~ 1.3 times more efficient than hydrophilic CS@CH NPs in tomato plant root penetration. An atomic force microscopy (AFM) adhesion force experiment confirms that hydrophobic NPs experience non-spontaneous yet energetically favorable root trapping and penetration. Further, a relative difference in the hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic NPs movement from roots to shoots has been observed and found related to the change in protein corona as identified by two dimensional-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) analysis. Finally, the toxicity assays at the give concentration showed that Cu<sub>2-x</sub>Se NPs lead to non-significant toxicity as compared to control. This technology may find an advantage in fertilizer application.</p>}},
  author       = {{Sharma, Sandeep and Muddassir, Mohd and Muthusamy, Saraladevi and Vaishnav, Pardeep Kumar and Singh, Manish and Sharma, Deepak and Kanagarajan, Selvaraju and Shanmugam, Vijayakumar}},
  issn         = {{2045-2322}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{Scientific Reports}},
  title        = {{A non-classical route of efficient plant uptake verified with fluorescent nanoparticles and root adhesion forces investigated using AFM}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75685-3}},
  doi          = {{10.1038/s41598-020-75685-3}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}