PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF SUSPENSION CRITERIA SCENARIOS: RADIOTHERAPY.
(2013) In Radiation Protection Dosimetry 153(2). p.179-184- Abstract
- In 2007, the European Commission (EC) commissioned a group of experts to undertake the revision of Report RP91 'Criteria for Acceptability of Radiological (including Radiotherapy) and Nuclear Medicine Installations' written in 1997. The revised draft report was submitted to the EC in 2010, which issued it for public consultation. The EC commissioned the same group of experts to consider the comments of the public consultation for further improvement of the revised report. The EC intends to publish the final report under its Radiation Report Series as RP162. This paper presents a selection of practical applications of suspension criteria scenarios in radiotherapy, mostly in brachytherapy, with special emphasis on the critical roles and... (More)
- In 2007, the European Commission (EC) commissioned a group of experts to undertake the revision of Report RP91 'Criteria for Acceptability of Radiological (including Radiotherapy) and Nuclear Medicine Installations' written in 1997. The revised draft report was submitted to the EC in 2010, which issued it for public consultation. The EC commissioned the same group of experts to consider the comments of the public consultation for further improvement of the revised report. The EC intends to publish the final report under its Radiation Report Series as RP162. This paper presents a selection of practical applications of suspension criteria scenarios in radiotherapy, mostly in brachytherapy, with special emphasis on the critical roles and responsibilities of qualified radiotherapy staff (radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiotherapy technicians). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3218634
- author
- Lamm, Inger-Lena LU ; Horton, P ; Lehmann, W and Lillicrap, S
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- volume
- 153
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 179 - 184
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000314125700011
- pmid:23169812
- scopus:84873860949
- pmid:23169812
- ISSN
- 1742-3406
- DOI
- 10.1093/rpd/ncs292
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 866fc618-29d1-44e9-ba2d-08f903884450 (old id 3218634)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169812?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 14:32:56
- date last changed
- 2022-01-28 01:13:53
@article{866fc618-29d1-44e9-ba2d-08f903884450, abstract = {{In 2007, the European Commission (EC) commissioned a group of experts to undertake the revision of Report RP91 'Criteria for Acceptability of Radiological (including Radiotherapy) and Nuclear Medicine Installations' written in 1997. The revised draft report was submitted to the EC in 2010, which issued it for public consultation. The EC commissioned the same group of experts to consider the comments of the public consultation for further improvement of the revised report. The EC intends to publish the final report under its Radiation Report Series as RP162. This paper presents a selection of practical applications of suspension criteria scenarios in radiotherapy, mostly in brachytherapy, with special emphasis on the critical roles and responsibilities of qualified radiotherapy staff (radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiotherapy technicians).}}, author = {{Lamm, Inger-Lena and Horton, P and Lehmann, W and Lillicrap, S}}, issn = {{1742-3406}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{179--184}}, publisher = {{Oxford University Press}}, series = {{Radiation Protection Dosimetry}}, title = {{PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF SUSPENSION CRITERIA SCENARIOS: RADIOTHERAPY.}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/4032782/3858169.pdf}}, doi = {{10.1093/rpd/ncs292}}, volume = {{153}}, year = {{2013}}, }