Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Assessing Quality of Vision in Cataract Surgery : A Randomized Trial of Digital vs. Paper-Based Questionnaires

Rein, Adi Porat ; Lundström, Mats LU ; Dickman, Mor M. ; Rosen, Matan ; Finkelman, Yaron ; Semionov, Anastasia ; Zadok, David and Abulafia, Adi (2025) In Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Abstract

Purpose: To introduce a newly developed digital platform and compare its reliability and agreement with paper-based questionnaires for assessing quality of vision before and after cataract surgery. Setting: University-affiliated ophthalmology department and private clinic. Design: Prospective, randomized trial with parallel design of 1:1 allocation ratio without masking. Methods: Between 11/2021 and 6/2023, patients from a preoperative cataract clinic, aged ≥21 years, with cataracts in both eyes and internet access were randomly assigned by "ALEA"software to complete Catquest-9SF and Quality-of-Vision (QoV) questionnaires before surgery and after second eye surgery via paper or a newly developed digital European Registry of Quality... (More)

Purpose: To introduce a newly developed digital platform and compare its reliability and agreement with paper-based questionnaires for assessing quality of vision before and after cataract surgery. Setting: University-affiliated ophthalmology department and private clinic. Design: Prospective, randomized trial with parallel design of 1:1 allocation ratio without masking. Methods: Between 11/2021 and 6/2023, patients from a preoperative cataract clinic, aged ≥21 years, with cataracts in both eyes and internet access were randomly assigned by "ALEA"software to complete Catquest-9SF and Quality-of-Vision (QoV) questionnaires before surgery and after second eye surgery via paper or a newly developed digital European Registry of Quality Outcomes in Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) platform. Statistical analyses evaluated agreement between methods, and validation was by Rasch analysis. Results: Half (183/364, 50.3%) of the enrolled patients were allocated to digital questionnaires. After exclusion due to technical issues, missing questions, and withdrawal, 307/364 patients remained, of whom 159 (51.8%) filled in digital questionnaires. Half of all patients (n=154) underwent sequential surgeries on both eyes after a minimum one-month interval. Seventy-two (72/154, 46.8%) completed postoperative questionnaires. Comparative analysis found no significant differences between paper and digital methods. Catquest-9SF and QoV questionnaires demonstrated good precision and reliability (Rasch analysis). Postoperative vision improved at an average of 2.82 logits. Conclusion: The newly developed digital EUREQUO platform for patient assessment of quality of vision before and after cataract surgery with the Catquest-9SF and QoV questionnaires, offers a reliable alternative to traditional paper-based questionnaires, enhancing convenience for patients and providers.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
cataract, Catquest-9SF, digital-platform, EUREQUO, PROM, QOV, questionnaires
in
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
article number
1642
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • pmid:39999203
  • scopus:105001728888
ISSN
0886-3350
DOI
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001642
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
868e923e-1cbe-4739-915d-9c90fdcfb2a0
date added to LUP
2025-09-01 13:59:50
date last changed
2025-09-01 14:00:38
@article{868e923e-1cbe-4739-915d-9c90fdcfb2a0,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose: To introduce a newly developed digital platform and compare its reliability and agreement with paper-based questionnaires for assessing quality of vision before and after cataract surgery. Setting: University-affiliated ophthalmology department and private clinic. Design: Prospective, randomized trial with parallel design of 1:1 allocation ratio without masking. Methods: Between 11/2021 and 6/2023, patients from a preoperative cataract clinic, aged ≥21 years, with cataracts in both eyes and internet access were randomly assigned by "ALEA"software to complete Catquest-9SF and Quality-of-Vision (QoV) questionnaires before surgery and after second eye surgery via paper or a newly developed digital European Registry of Quality Outcomes in Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) platform. Statistical analyses evaluated agreement between methods, and validation was by Rasch analysis. Results: Half (183/364, 50.3%) of the enrolled patients were allocated to digital questionnaires. After exclusion due to technical issues, missing questions, and withdrawal, 307/364 patients remained, of whom 159 (51.8%) filled in digital questionnaires. Half of all patients (n=154) underwent sequential surgeries on both eyes after a minimum one-month interval. Seventy-two (72/154, 46.8%) completed postoperative questionnaires. Comparative analysis found no significant differences between paper and digital methods. Catquest-9SF and QoV questionnaires demonstrated good precision and reliability (Rasch analysis). Postoperative vision improved at an average of 2.82 logits. Conclusion: The newly developed digital EUREQUO platform for patient assessment of quality of vision before and after cataract surgery with the Catquest-9SF and QoV questionnaires, offers a reliable alternative to traditional paper-based questionnaires, enhancing convenience for patients and providers.</p>}},
  author       = {{Rein, Adi Porat and Lundström, Mats and Dickman, Mor M. and Rosen, Matan and Finkelman, Yaron and Semionov, Anastasia and Zadok, David and Abulafia, Adi}},
  issn         = {{0886-3350}},
  keywords     = {{cataract; Catquest-9SF; digital-platform; EUREQUO; PROM; QOV; questionnaires}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery}},
  title        = {{Assessing Quality of Vision in Cataract Surgery : A Randomized Trial of Digital vs. Paper-Based Questionnaires}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001642}},
  doi          = {{10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001642}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}