Advanced

Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials

Nystrom, L; Andersson, Ingvar LU ; Bjurstam, N; Frisell, J; Nordenskjold, B and Rutqvist, LE (2002) In The Lancet 359(9310). p.909-919
Abstract
Background There has been much debate about the value of screening mammography. Here we update the overview of the Swedish randomised controlled trials on mammography screening up to and including 1996. The Kopparberg part of the Two-County trial was not available for the overview, but the continuation of the Malmo trial (MMST II) has been added. The article also contains basic data from the trials that have not been presented before. Methods The trials (n=247 010, invited group 129 750, control group 117 260) have been followed up by record linkage to the Swedish Cancer and Cause of Death Registers. The relative risks (RR) for breast cancer death and mortality were calculated for the invited and the control groups. The trial-specific as... (More)
Background There has been much debate about the value of screening mammography. Here we update the overview of the Swedish randomised controlled trials on mammography screening up to and including 1996. The Kopparberg part of the Two-County trial was not available for the overview, but the continuation of the Malmo trial (MMST II) has been added. The article also contains basic data from the trials that have not been presented before. Methods The trials (n=247 010, invited group 129 750, control group 117 260) have been followed up by record linkage to the Swedish Cancer and Cause of Death Registers. The relative risks (RR) for breast cancer death and mortality were calculated for the invited and the control groups. The trial-specific as well as the age-specific effects were analysed. RRs were calculated by the density method, with total person-time experience of the cohort by time interval of follow-up as a basis for estimating mortality rates. We calculated weighted RRs and 95% CI with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Findings The median trial time-the time from randomisation until the first round was completed for the control group or if the control group was not invited, until end of follow-up-was 6.5 years (range 3.0-18.1). The median follow-up time, the time from randomisation, to the end of follow-up, was 15.8 years (5.8-20.2). There were 511 breast cancer deaths in 1864 770 women-years in the invited groups and 584 breast cancer deaths in 1688 440 women-years in the control groups, a significant 21% reduction in breast cancer mortality (RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89). The reduction was greatest in the age group 60-69 years at entry (33%). Looking at 5-year age groups, there were statistically significant effects in the age groups 55-59, 60-64, and 65-69 years (RR=0.76, 0.68, and 0.69, respectively). There was a small effect in women 50-54 years at randomisation (RR=0.95). The benefit in terms of cumulative breast cancer mortality started to emerge at about 4 years after randomisation and continued to increase to about 10 years. Thereafter the benefit in absolute terms was maintained throughout the period of observation. The age-adjusted relative risk for the total mortality was 0.98 (0.96-1.00). Interpretation The advantageous effect of breast screening on breast cancer mortality persists after long-term follow-up. The recent criticism against the Swedish randomised controlled trials is misleading and scientifically unfounded. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
The Lancet
volume
359
issue
9310
pages
909 - 919
publisher
Elsevier Limited
external identifiers
  • wos:000174391700007
  • pmid:11918907
  • scopus:0037117140
ISSN
1474-547X
DOI
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
472775d7-5751-4be2-be1f-b77dd004e5d2 (old id 893724)
date added to LUP
2008-01-23 22:12:38
date last changed
2017-12-10 03:48:40
@article{472775d7-5751-4be2-be1f-b77dd004e5d2,
  abstract     = {Background There has been much debate about the value of screening mammography. Here we update the overview of the Swedish randomised controlled trials on mammography screening up to and including 1996. The Kopparberg part of the Two-County trial was not available for the overview, but the continuation of the Malmo trial (MMST II) has been added. The article also contains basic data from the trials that have not been presented before. Methods The trials (n=247 010, invited group 129 750, control group 117 260) have been followed up by record linkage to the Swedish Cancer and Cause of Death Registers. The relative risks (RR) for breast cancer death and mortality were calculated for the invited and the control groups. The trial-specific as well as the age-specific effects were analysed. RRs were calculated by the density method, with total person-time experience of the cohort by time interval of follow-up as a basis for estimating mortality rates. We calculated weighted RRs and 95% CI with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Findings The median trial time-the time from randomisation until the first round was completed for the control group or if the control group was not invited, until end of follow-up-was 6.5 years (range 3.0-18.1). The median follow-up time, the time from randomisation, to the end of follow-up, was 15.8 years (5.8-20.2). There were 511 breast cancer deaths in 1864 770 women-years in the invited groups and 584 breast cancer deaths in 1688 440 women-years in the control groups, a significant 21% reduction in breast cancer mortality (RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89). The reduction was greatest in the age group 60-69 years at entry (33%). Looking at 5-year age groups, there were statistically significant effects in the age groups 55-59, 60-64, and 65-69 years (RR=0.76, 0.68, and 0.69, respectively). There was a small effect in women 50-54 years at randomisation (RR=0.95). The benefit in terms of cumulative breast cancer mortality started to emerge at about 4 years after randomisation and continued to increase to about 10 years. Thereafter the benefit in absolute terms was maintained throughout the period of observation. The age-adjusted relative risk for the total mortality was 0.98 (0.96-1.00). Interpretation The advantageous effect of breast screening on breast cancer mortality persists after long-term follow-up. The recent criticism against the Swedish randomised controlled trials is misleading and scientifically unfounded.},
  author       = {Nystrom, L and Andersson, Ingvar and Bjurstam, N and Frisell, J and Nordenskjold, B and Rutqvist, LE},
  issn         = {1474-547X},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {9310},
  pages        = {909--919},
  publisher    = {Elsevier Limited},
  series       = {The Lancet},
  title        = {Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0},
  volume       = {359},
  year         = {2002},
}