Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Discomfort and Clinical Documentation in Postoperative Care of Central Venous Catheters After Surgery : A Prospective Descriptive Study

Lithner, Maria LU ; Noghi, Adina and Kander, Thomas LU orcid (2025) In Health Science Reports 8(12).
Abstract

Background and Aim: Central venous catheters are vital in the peri- and postoperative period for patients undergoing abdominal surgery but are associated with risks such as catheter related infections. Signs of infection, like tenderness and induration at the insertion site, are important to recognize, as they may precede catheter-related infections, but are often neglected. The aim was to compare surgical patients' experience of central venous catheter with the nursing documentation. Methods: Data was collected from short patient interviews and by reviewing electronic health record documentation. Results: In total, 106 patients were included, 103 of whom had a central venous catheter located in the internal jugular vein. The median... (More)

Background and Aim: Central venous catheters are vital in the peri- and postoperative period for patients undergoing abdominal surgery but are associated with risks such as catheter related infections. Signs of infection, like tenderness and induration at the insertion site, are important to recognize, as they may precede catheter-related infections, but are often neglected. The aim was to compare surgical patients' experience of central venous catheter with the nursing documentation. Methods: Data was collected from short patient interviews and by reviewing electronic health record documentation. Results: In total, 106 patients were included, 103 of whom had a central venous catheter located in the internal jugular vein. The median (interquartile range) number of days with a catheter was 10 (8–16). There were no catheter related infections, but potential risks were identified. In 56% of the patients, central venous catheters were removed within the last 2 days before discharge. The most common reason for keeping the catheter was blood sampling. The results from the interviews indicate that 37 of the patients experienced considerable discomfort, such as persistent sensations of constriction, restricted mobility and pain, however, these symptoms were documented in the electronic health record for only three patients. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the necessity of systematically addressing patients' symptoms and individual needs in the postoperative care of the central venous catheter. Incorporating these aspects as a mandatory element in the standardized documentation template within the electronic health record will constitute an important first step toward enhancing patient-centred care. There is a need for clearly defined guidelines outlining the indications for retention or removal of central venous catheters to minimize catheter-days during postoperative care in surgical wards. Trial Registration: As this was a descriptive, qualitative observational study that did not involve testing a new intervention, compare interventions, or randomize participants, we did not find trial registration necessary under commonly accepted guidelines for clinical trial registration.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
central venous catheter, CLABSI, device removal, documentation, infection control, postoperative care, vascular access device
in
Health Science Reports
volume
8
issue
12
article number
e71632
publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
external identifiers
  • scopus:105025234524
ISSN
2398-8835
DOI
10.1002/hsr2.71632
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
id
8999b14f-52c7-4c3f-8669-d238a260ea6c
date added to LUP
2025-12-29 15:02:11
date last changed
2025-12-30 10:25:41
@article{8999b14f-52c7-4c3f-8669-d238a260ea6c,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background and Aim: Central venous catheters are vital in the peri- and postoperative period for patients undergoing abdominal surgery but are associated with risks such as catheter related infections. Signs of infection, like tenderness and induration at the insertion site, are important to recognize, as they may precede catheter-related infections, but are often neglected. The aim was to compare surgical patients' experience of central venous catheter with the nursing documentation. Methods: Data was collected from short patient interviews and by reviewing electronic health record documentation. Results: In total, 106 patients were included, 103 of whom had a central venous catheter located in the internal jugular vein. The median (interquartile range) number of days with a catheter was 10 (8–16). There were no catheter related infections, but potential risks were identified. In 56% of the patients, central venous catheters were removed within the last 2 days before discharge. The most common reason for keeping the catheter was blood sampling. The results from the interviews indicate that 37 of the patients experienced considerable discomfort, such as persistent sensations of constriction, restricted mobility and pain, however, these symptoms were documented in the electronic health record for only three patients. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the necessity of systematically addressing patients' symptoms and individual needs in the postoperative care of the central venous catheter. Incorporating these aspects as a mandatory element in the standardized documentation template within the electronic health record will constitute an important first step toward enhancing patient-centred care. There is a need for clearly defined guidelines outlining the indications for retention or removal of central venous catheters to minimize catheter-days during postoperative care in surgical wards. Trial Registration: As this was a descriptive, qualitative observational study that did not involve testing a new intervention, compare interventions, or randomize participants, we did not find trial registration necessary under commonly accepted guidelines for clinical trial registration.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lithner, Maria and Noghi, Adina and Kander, Thomas}},
  issn         = {{2398-8835}},
  keywords     = {{central venous catheter; CLABSI; device removal; documentation; infection control; postoperative care; vascular access device}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{12}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{Health Science Reports}},
  title        = {{Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Discomfort and Clinical Documentation in Postoperative Care of Central Venous Catheters After Surgery : A Prospective Descriptive Study}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71632}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/hsr2.71632}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}