Early Ezetimibe Initiation After Myocardial Infarction Protects Against Later Cardiovascular Outcomes in the SWEDEHEART Registry
(2025) In Journal of the American College of Cardiology 85(15). p.1550-1564- Abstract
Background: Combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) achieves lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and better cardiovascular outcomes vs statin monotherapy. As a result, global guidelines recommend lower LDL-C but, paradoxically, advise treatment through a stepwise approach. Yet the need for combination therapy is inevitable as <20% of patients achieve goals with statins alone. Whether combining ezetimibe with a statin early vs late after MI results in better outcomes is unknown. Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the impact of delayed treatment escalation on outcomes by comparing early vs late oral combination LLT (statins plus ezetimibe) in patients with MI.... (More)
Background: Combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) achieves lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and better cardiovascular outcomes vs statin monotherapy. As a result, global guidelines recommend lower LDL-C but, paradoxically, advise treatment through a stepwise approach. Yet the need for combination therapy is inevitable as <20% of patients achieve goals with statins alone. Whether combining ezetimibe with a statin early vs late after MI results in better outcomes is unknown. Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the impact of delayed treatment escalation on outcomes by comparing early vs late oral combination LLT (statins plus ezetimibe) in patients with MI. Methods: LLT-naïve patients (SWEDEHEART registry) hospitalized for MI (2015-2022) and discharged on statins were included. Using clone-censor-weight and Cox proportional hazards models, we compared differences in risks of MACE (death, MI, stroke), components of MACE, and cardiovascular death between patients with ezetimibe added to statins ≤12 weeks after discharge as reference (early combination therapy), from 13 weeks to 16 months (late combination therapy), or not at all. Results: Of 35,826 patients (median age 65.1 years, 26.0% women), 6,040 (16.9%) received ezetimibe early, 6,495 (18.1%) ezetimibe late, and 23,291 (65.0%) received no ezetimibe. High-intensity statin use was ≥98% in all groups. Over a median 3.96 years (Q1-Q3: 2.15-5.81 years), 2,570 patients had MACE (440 cardiovascular deaths). One-year MACE incidences were 1.79 (early), 2.58 (late), and 4.03 (none) per 100 patient-years. Compared with early combination therapy, weighted risk differences in MACE for late combination therapy at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1%-1.1%; P < 0.01), 1.1% (95% CI: 0.3%-2.0%; P < 0.01), and 0.7% (95% CI: −0.2% to 1.3%; P = 0.18), and 3-year HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95-1.41). For those receiving no ezetimibe, risk differences were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2%-1.3%), 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.5%), and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.8%-3.1%; P for all <0.01; 3-year HR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.12-1.55]). Similar differences in risk of cardiovascular death at 3 years were observed (HRs vs early: late: 1.64 [95% CI: 1.15-2.63]; none: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.35-2.69]). Conclusions: MI care pathways should implement early combination therapy with statins and ezetimibe as standard care, because delaying use of combination LLT or using high-intensity statin monotherapy is associated with avoidable harm.
(Less)
- author
- Leosdottir, Margret LU ; Schubert, Jessica ; Brandts, Julia ; Gustafsson, Stefan ; Cars, Thomas ; Sundström, Johan ; Jernberg, Tomas ; Ray, Kausik K. and Hagström, Emil
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-04
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- combination therapy, ezetimibe, lipid-lowering therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, myocardial infarction, statin
- in
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- volume
- 85
- issue
- 15
- pages
- 15 pages
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:40240093
- scopus:105001853671
- ISSN
- 0735-1097
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.007
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 8c6beff8-3314-4048-abb0-f8b29a4cc489
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-08 09:28:43
- date last changed
- 2025-08-08 10:40:18
@article{8c6beff8-3314-4048-abb0-f8b29a4cc489,
abstract = {{<p>Background: Combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) achieves lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and better cardiovascular outcomes vs statin monotherapy. As a result, global guidelines recommend lower LDL-C but, paradoxically, advise treatment through a stepwise approach. Yet the need for combination therapy is inevitable as <20% of patients achieve goals with statins alone. Whether combining ezetimibe with a statin early vs late after MI results in better outcomes is unknown. Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the impact of delayed treatment escalation on outcomes by comparing early vs late oral combination LLT (statins plus ezetimibe) in patients with MI. Methods: LLT-naïve patients (SWEDEHEART registry) hospitalized for MI (2015-2022) and discharged on statins were included. Using clone-censor-weight and Cox proportional hazards models, we compared differences in risks of MACE (death, MI, stroke), components of MACE, and cardiovascular death between patients with ezetimibe added to statins ≤12 weeks after discharge as reference (early combination therapy), from 13 weeks to 16 months (late combination therapy), or not at all. Results: Of 35,826 patients (median age 65.1 years, 26.0% women), 6,040 (16.9%) received ezetimibe early, 6,495 (18.1%) ezetimibe late, and 23,291 (65.0%) received no ezetimibe. High-intensity statin use was ≥98% in all groups. Over a median 3.96 years (Q1-Q3: 2.15-5.81 years), 2,570 patients had MACE (440 cardiovascular deaths). One-year MACE incidences were 1.79 (early), 2.58 (late), and 4.03 (none) per 100 patient-years. Compared with early combination therapy, weighted risk differences in MACE for late combination therapy at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1%-1.1%; P < 0.01), 1.1% (95% CI: 0.3%-2.0%; P < 0.01), and 0.7% (95% CI: −0.2% to 1.3%; P = 0.18), and 3-year HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95-1.41). For those receiving no ezetimibe, risk differences were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2%-1.3%), 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.5%), and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.8%-3.1%; P for all <0.01; 3-year HR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.12-1.55]). Similar differences in risk of cardiovascular death at 3 years were observed (HRs vs early: late: 1.64 [95% CI: 1.15-2.63]; none: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.35-2.69]). Conclusions: MI care pathways should implement early combination therapy with statins and ezetimibe as standard care, because delaying use of combination LLT or using high-intensity statin monotherapy is associated with avoidable harm.</p>}},
author = {{Leosdottir, Margret and Schubert, Jessica and Brandts, Julia and Gustafsson, Stefan and Cars, Thomas and Sundström, Johan and Jernberg, Tomas and Ray, Kausik K. and Hagström, Emil}},
issn = {{0735-1097}},
keywords = {{combination therapy; ezetimibe; lipid-lowering therapy; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; myocardial infarction; statin}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{15}},
pages = {{1550--1564}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of the American College of Cardiology}},
title = {{Early Ezetimibe Initiation After Myocardial Infarction Protects Against Later Cardiovascular Outcomes in the SWEDEHEART Registry}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.007}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.007}},
volume = {{85}},
year = {{2025}},
}