Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Floodplain Inundation Analysis Combined with Contingent Valuation : Implications for Sustainable Flood Risk Management

Ghanbarpour, M. Reza ; Saravi, Mohsen Mohseni and Salimi, Shokoufe (2014) In Water Resources Management 28(9). p.2491-2505
Abstract

This study presents the results of open-ended contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate the residents' maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for flood insurance and structural flood control measures in the Neka River Basin in Northern Iran. Flood inundation analysis and floodplain risk mapping were conducted by applying the HEC-RAS model combined with GIS analysis. A calibrated 100-year flood risk inundation map was considered as a basis for this research. This paper demonstrates applicability of CVM combined with flood inundation analysis to understand public participation for flood risk management, and their perception of flooding, considering associated socioeconomic and environmental factors. The results have shown that stated WTPs... (More)

This study presents the results of open-ended contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate the residents' maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for flood insurance and structural flood control measures in the Neka River Basin in Northern Iran. Flood inundation analysis and floodplain risk mapping were conducted by applying the HEC-RAS model combined with GIS analysis. A calibrated 100-year flood risk inundation map was considered as a basis for this research. This paper demonstrates applicability of CVM combined with flood inundation analysis to understand public participation for flood risk management, and their perception of flooding, considering associated socioeconomic and environmental factors. The results have shown that stated WTPs significantly varies with household income, distance people live from the river and the land use type of properties. Findings of this study suggest that the majority of respondents view flood hazard as the most important natural disaster. Furthermore, WTPs are significantly higher for those who have high level of flood risk perception. Three policy options for flood risk management are discussed, which include flood zoning and land use regulation, flood insurance program, and structural measure of levee construction. The advantages and disadvantages of each option are explored. It was concluded that a combination of possible mitigation options should be considered in order to achieve sustainable flood risk management in the Neka River Floodplain.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Contingent valuation, Flood insurance, Floodplain management, Risk, Willingness to pay
in
Water Resources Management
volume
28
issue
9
pages
15 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:84902320508
ISSN
0920-4741
DOI
10.1007/s11269-014-0622-2
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
8cb1ea44-9f3b-492d-b75f-5ceaf99fc412
date added to LUP
2019-05-03 11:26:02
date last changed
2022-04-10 07:58:51
@article{8cb1ea44-9f3b-492d-b75f-5ceaf99fc412,
  abstract     = {{<p>This study presents the results of open-ended contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate the residents' maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for flood insurance and structural flood control measures in the Neka River Basin in Northern Iran. Flood inundation analysis and floodplain risk mapping were conducted by applying the HEC-RAS model combined with GIS analysis. A calibrated 100-year flood risk inundation map was considered as a basis for this research. This paper demonstrates applicability of CVM combined with flood inundation analysis to understand public participation for flood risk management, and their perception of flooding, considering associated socioeconomic and environmental factors. The results have shown that stated WTPs significantly varies with household income, distance people live from the river and the land use type of properties. Findings of this study suggest that the majority of respondents view flood hazard as the most important natural disaster. Furthermore, WTPs are significantly higher for those who have high level of flood risk perception. Three policy options for flood risk management are discussed, which include flood zoning and land use regulation, flood insurance program, and structural measure of levee construction. The advantages and disadvantages of each option are explored. It was concluded that a combination of possible mitigation options should be considered in order to achieve sustainable flood risk management in the Neka River Floodplain.</p>}},
  author       = {{Ghanbarpour, M. Reza and Saravi, Mohsen Mohseni and Salimi, Shokoufe}},
  issn         = {{0920-4741}},
  keywords     = {{Contingent valuation; Flood insurance; Floodplain management; Risk; Willingness to pay}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{01}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{2491--2505}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Water Resources Management}},
  title        = {{Floodplain Inundation Analysis Combined with Contingent Valuation : Implications for Sustainable Flood Risk Management}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0622-2}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11269-014-0622-2}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}