Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling : Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion

Håkansson, Anders LU and Åkesson, Gunny LU (2022) In JMIR Mental Health 9(8).
Abstract

Background: Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling is a common harm reduction option for individuals with gambling problems. Multi-operator, nationwide self-exclusion services are rare, and a system introduced in the highly web-based gambling market of Sweden is a rare and recent example. However, where web-based casino gambling and web-based betting are the predominate gambling types in those seeking treatment, the risk of breaching one’s own self-exclusion through overseas web-based operators may also be high. Objective: This study aims to assess the prevalence of a nationwide Spelpaus (“gambling break”) self-exclusion and the prevalence of gambling despite self-exclusion in patients seeking treatment for gambling disorder in 2021.... (More)

Background: Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling is a common harm reduction option for individuals with gambling problems. Multi-operator, nationwide self-exclusion services are rare, and a system introduced in the highly web-based gambling market of Sweden is a rare and recent example. However, where web-based casino gambling and web-based betting are the predominate gambling types in those seeking treatment, the risk of breaching one’s own self-exclusion through overseas web-based operators may also be high. Objective: This study aims to assess the prevalence of a nationwide Spelpaus (“gambling break”) self-exclusion and the prevalence of gambling despite self-exclusion in patients seeking treatment for gambling disorder in 2021. Methods: Health care documentation of recent treatment seekers (January 1 through September 1, 2021, N=85) in a Swedish treatment facility was reviewed for data regarding problematic gambling types reported, history of self-exclusion, and history of breaching of that self-exclusion. Results: Common problem gambling types were web-based casino gambling (49/74, 66%) and sports betting (19/74, 26%). The majority who participated in this study (62/85, 73%) were men. All women reported web-based casino gambling. Self-exclusion through Spelpaus was common (60/74, 81%). Among self-excluders, gambling despite self-exclusion was common (41/60, 68%), most commonly on unlicensed gambling websites. Conclusions: The nationwide, multi-operator self-exclusion service of Sweden appears to reach many patients with a gambling disorder. However, the remaining gambling options in an web-based gambling setting present a major challenge despite self-exclusion. The recent data calls for further treatment efforts and potential improvements in services aiming to help voluntary self-excluders abstain from gambling.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
abstain, addiction, behavioral addiction, gambling, gambling disorder, harm reduction, prevalence, problem gambling, self-exclusion, web-based gambling
in
JMIR Mental Health
volume
9
issue
8
article number
e37837
publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
external identifiers
  • pmid:35984678
  • scopus:85139722615
ISSN
2368-7959
DOI
10.2196/37837
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
8e7c56d8-f7ae-4b9b-bff1-43a76b5cca27
date added to LUP
2023-01-20 08:46:02
date last changed
2024-04-18 18:15:47
@article{8e7c56d8-f7ae-4b9b-bff1-43a76b5cca27,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling is a common harm reduction option for individuals with gambling problems. Multi-operator, nationwide self-exclusion services are rare, and a system introduced in the highly web-based gambling market of Sweden is a rare and recent example. However, where web-based casino gambling and web-based betting are the predominate gambling types in those seeking treatment, the risk of breaching one’s own self-exclusion through overseas web-based operators may also be high. Objective: This study aims to assess the prevalence of a nationwide Spelpaus (“gambling break”) self-exclusion and the prevalence of gambling despite self-exclusion in patients seeking treatment for gambling disorder in 2021. Methods: Health care documentation of recent treatment seekers (January 1 through September 1, 2021, N=85) in a Swedish treatment facility was reviewed for data regarding problematic gambling types reported, history of self-exclusion, and history of breaching of that self-exclusion. Results: Common problem gambling types were web-based casino gambling (49/74, 66%) and sports betting (19/74, 26%). The majority who participated in this study (62/85, 73%) were men. All women reported web-based casino gambling. Self-exclusion through Spelpaus was common (60/74, 81%). Among self-excluders, gambling despite self-exclusion was common (41/60, 68%), most commonly on unlicensed gambling websites. Conclusions: The nationwide, multi-operator self-exclusion service of Sweden appears to reach many patients with a gambling disorder. However, the remaining gambling options in an web-based gambling setting present a major challenge despite self-exclusion. The recent data calls for further treatment efforts and potential improvements in services aiming to help voluntary self-excluders abstain from gambling.</p>}},
  author       = {{Håkansson, Anders and Åkesson, Gunny}},
  issn         = {{2368-7959}},
  keywords     = {{abstain; addiction; behavioral addiction; gambling; gambling disorder; harm reduction; prevalence; problem gambling; self-exclusion; web-based gambling}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{08}},
  number       = {{8}},
  publisher    = {{JMIR Publications Inc.}},
  series       = {{JMIR Mental Health}},
  title        = {{Multi-operator Self-exclusion as a Harm Reduction Measure in Problem Gambling : Retrospective Clinical Study on Gambling Relapse Despite Self-exclusion}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37837}},
  doi          = {{10.2196/37837}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}