What makes a best exemplar?
(2012) UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 3rd edition 1. p.401-418- Abstract
- This paper is part of a broader multilingual research project that addresses the relationships between affective phenomena (as units of personal experience), concepts (as units of cognitive processing) and the lexical items we use in talking about affective experience (as units of verbal communication. The focus will be here on data obtained in six Scandinavian and Romance languages (N=1093) with the help of a reasoning task that supplemented a free listing and a ranking task. The task was specifically designed for assessing whether informants’ choice of best (or most typical) exemplars of a superordinate category in the affective domain relies on a similarity-based strategy of attribute matching and family resemblance computation as... (More)
- This paper is part of a broader multilingual research project that addresses the relationships between affective phenomena (as units of personal experience), concepts (as units of cognitive processing) and the lexical items we use in talking about affective experience (as units of verbal communication. The focus will be here on data obtained in six Scandinavian and Romance languages (N=1093) with the help of a reasoning task that supplemented a free listing and a ranking task. The task was specifically designed for assessing whether informants’ choice of best (or most typical) exemplars of a superordinate category in the affective domain relies on a similarity-based strategy of attribute matching and family resemblance computation as suggested by prototype theory. As a consequence, the instructions were formulated so to encourage the use of a similarity-based comparison in justifying the choice of best exemplars. The responses provided by the informants show instead that participants may resort to a variety of alternative criteria (frequency, complexity, basicness, intensity, cultural or personal meaning, etc.) for assigning best-exemplar status. It is contended that such alternative criteria are consistent with a theory- (or knowledge-) based approach to concepts and categorization and that a hybrid, multi-strategy approach is more suitable in order to account for categorization in the affective domain. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4221612
- author
- Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina LU
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- emotions, categorization, prototype, knowledge-based, Scandinavian, Romance
- host publication
- Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings
- editor
- Hart, Chrisopher
- volume
- 1
- pages
- 17 pages
- publisher
- UK Cognitive Linguistics Association
- conference name
- UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 3rd edition
- conference location
- University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
- conference dates
- 2010-07-06 - 2010-07-08
- ISSN
- 2046-9144
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 8f06a44f-2a6d-47c5-bbd1-9035cc6ea59e (old id 4221612)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 14:22:39
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 20:26:09
@inproceedings{8f06a44f-2a6d-47c5-bbd1-9035cc6ea59e,
abstract = {{This paper is part of a broader multilingual research project that addresses the relationships between affective phenomena (as units of personal experience), concepts (as units of cognitive processing) and the lexical items we use in talking about affective experience (as units of verbal communication. The focus will be here on data obtained in six Scandinavian and Romance languages (N=1093) with the help of a reasoning task that supplemented a free listing and a ranking task. The task was specifically designed for assessing whether informants’ choice of best (or most typical) exemplars of a superordinate category in the affective domain relies on a similarity-based strategy of attribute matching and family resemblance computation as suggested by prototype theory. As a consequence, the instructions were formulated so to encourage the use of a similarity-based comparison in justifying the choice of best exemplars. The responses provided by the informants show instead that participants may resort to a variety of alternative criteria (frequency, complexity, basicness, intensity, cultural or personal meaning, etc.) for assigning best-exemplar status. It is contended that such alternative criteria are consistent with a theory- (or knowledge-) based approach to concepts and categorization and that a hybrid, multi-strategy approach is more suitable in order to account for categorization in the affective domain.}},
author = {{Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina}},
booktitle = {{Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings}},
editor = {{Hart, Chrisopher}},
issn = {{2046-9144}},
keywords = {{emotions; categorization; prototype; knowledge-based; Scandinavian; Romance}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{401--418}},
publisher = {{UK Cognitive Linguistics Association}},
title = {{What makes a best exemplar?}},
volume = {{1}},
year = {{2012}},
}