Repulsion between oppositely charged surfaces in multivalent electrolytes
(2006) In Physical Review Letters 97(6).- Abstract
- In answer to recent experimental force measurements between oppositely charged surfaces we here reproduce the repulsion in the presence of multivalent salt using Monte Carlo simulations within the primitive model. Our osmotic pressure curves are in good agreement with experimental results. In contrast with Poisson-Boltzmann calculations, both repulsion and charge inversion are seen in the simulations. Repulsion is observed only for conditions under which there is charge inversion at large separations. However, in these cases, the repulsion is present also at intermediate separations, where there is no charge inversion. The charge inversion is thereby not the cause of the repulsion. Instead the repulsion appears to be an effect of the large... (More)
- In answer to recent experimental force measurements between oppositely charged surfaces we here reproduce the repulsion in the presence of multivalent salt using Monte Carlo simulations within the primitive model. Our osmotic pressure curves are in good agreement with experimental results. In contrast with Poisson-Boltzmann calculations, both repulsion and charge inversion are seen in the simulations. Repulsion is observed only for conditions under which there is charge inversion at large separations. However, in these cases, the repulsion is present also at intermediate separations, where there is no charge inversion. The charge inversion is thereby not the cause of the repulsion. Instead the repulsion appears to be an effect of the large amount of excess salt in the slit. Both phenomena, however, are closely linked and a consequence of ion-ion correlations, promoted by a strong electrostatic coupling. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/908520
- author
- Trulsson, Martin LU ; Jönsson, Bo LU ; Åkesson, Torbjörn LU ; Forsman, Jan LU and Labbez, Christophe
- organization
- publishing date
- 2006
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Physical Review Letters
- volume
- 97
- issue
- 6
- publisher
- American Physical Society
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000239690900063
- scopus:33747146751
- ISSN
- 1079-7114
- DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.068302
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Theoretical Chemistry (S) (011001039)
- id
- 9e7d2b14-b085-4050-9b1e-eb5be4c5908d (old id 908520)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:42:56
- date last changed
- 2023-01-02 22:19:55
@article{9e7d2b14-b085-4050-9b1e-eb5be4c5908d, abstract = {{In answer to recent experimental force measurements between oppositely charged surfaces we here reproduce the repulsion in the presence of multivalent salt using Monte Carlo simulations within the primitive model. Our osmotic pressure curves are in good agreement with experimental results. In contrast with Poisson-Boltzmann calculations, both repulsion and charge inversion are seen in the simulations. Repulsion is observed only for conditions under which there is charge inversion at large separations. However, in these cases, the repulsion is present also at intermediate separations, where there is no charge inversion. The charge inversion is thereby not the cause of the repulsion. Instead the repulsion appears to be an effect of the large amount of excess salt in the slit. Both phenomena, however, are closely linked and a consequence of ion-ion correlations, promoted by a strong electrostatic coupling.}}, author = {{Trulsson, Martin and Jönsson, Bo and Åkesson, Torbjörn and Forsman, Jan and Labbez, Christophe}}, issn = {{1079-7114}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{6}}, publisher = {{American Physical Society}}, series = {{Physical Review Letters}}, title = {{Repulsion between oppositely charged surfaces in multivalent electrolytes}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.068302}}, doi = {{10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.068302}}, volume = {{97}}, year = {{2006}}, }