The hegemony of integrated water resources management as a global water discourse
(2014) p.3-21- Abstract
The early form of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) emerged in the USA in the 1900s in order to manage interactions between water, land, eco- and social systems. By the end of the last century, IWRM has become a globally prominent policy concept. We concern ourselves with three questions, namely, a) “why did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; b) “how did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; and c) “what are the effects of IWRM being a globally popular concept”? We argue that this popularity can be explained in term of a neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony and the three-dimensional model of power. The hegemony of IWRM relies on: a) providing material incentives to engage with IWRM; b) directing normative persuasion... (More)
The early form of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) emerged in the USA in the 1900s in order to manage interactions between water, land, eco- and social systems. By the end of the last century, IWRM has become a globally prominent policy concept. We concern ourselves with three questions, namely, a) “why did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; b) “how did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; and c) “what are the effects of IWRM being a globally popular concept”? We argue that this popularity can be explained in term of a neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony and the three-dimensional model of power. The hegemony of IWRM relies on: a) providing material incentives to engage with IWRM; b) directing normative persuasion in order to create and diffuse the norms; and c) building up organizational hierarchies to support IWRM planning. Using water management in Kazakhstan as a case study, we demonstrate some of the risks associated with an uncritical embrace of IWRM which may stem from its global hegemony.
(Less)
- author
- Mukhtarov, Farhad and Cherp, Aleh LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014-01-01
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Fragmentation, Global water initiatives, Holistic management, IWRM, Kazakhstan, Neo-gramscian, Neoliberalism, Technocratic elites, Transnational actors, USA
- host publication
- River Basin Management in the Twenty-First Century : Understanding People and Place - Understanding People and Place
- pages
- 19 pages
- publisher
- CRC Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85055171502
- ISBN
- 9781466579620
- 9781466579637
- DOI
- 10.1201/b17168
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9271e3a3-34d3-48d3-85dc-db293244c905
- date added to LUP
- 2018-11-10 19:47:43
- date last changed
- 2025-01-08 19:33:24
@inbook{9271e3a3-34d3-48d3-85dc-db293244c905, abstract = {{<p>The early form of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) emerged in the USA in the 1900s in order to manage interactions between water, land, eco- and social systems. By the end of the last century, IWRM has become a globally prominent policy concept. We concern ourselves with three questions, namely, a) “why did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; b) “how did IWRM become a globally popular concept”?; and c) “what are the effects of IWRM being a globally popular concept”? We argue that this popularity can be explained in term of a neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony and the three-dimensional model of power. The hegemony of IWRM relies on: a) providing material incentives to engage with IWRM; b) directing normative persuasion in order to create and diffuse the norms; and c) building up organizational hierarchies to support IWRM planning. Using water management in Kazakhstan as a case study, we demonstrate some of the risks associated with an uncritical embrace of IWRM which may stem from its global hegemony.</p>}}, author = {{Mukhtarov, Farhad and Cherp, Aleh}}, booktitle = {{River Basin Management in the Twenty-First Century : Understanding People and Place}}, isbn = {{9781466579620}}, keywords = {{Fragmentation; Global water initiatives; Holistic management; IWRM; Kazakhstan; Neo-gramscian; Neoliberalism; Technocratic elites; Transnational actors; USA}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{01}}, pages = {{3--21}}, publisher = {{CRC Press}}, title = {{The hegemony of integrated water resources management as a global water discourse}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b17168}}, doi = {{10.1201/b17168}}, year = {{2014}}, }