Advanced

Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory

Svensson, Oscar LU and Nikoleris, Alexandra LU (2018) In Research Policy 47(2). p.462-473
Abstract
The most prominent framework for studying socio-technical transitions to date is the multi-level perspective (MLP). While appreciated for its flexibility and usefulness for studying socio-technical transitions it has not been without its critics. In this paper we focus on the ontological foundations of the MLP and its (in)ability to explain transitions and how they come about. The purpose is to initiate development of an explanatory theory for socio-technical transitions, by carrying out an immanent critique of the ontological foundations of the MLP together with a methodological critique. We show that the ontological foundations of the MLP to a large extent inhibits explanatory capacity. The argument is fourfold: since structure and... (More)
The most prominent framework for studying socio-technical transitions to date is the multi-level perspective (MLP). While appreciated for its flexibility and usefulness for studying socio-technical transitions it has not been without its critics. In this paper we focus on the ontological foundations of the MLP and its (in)ability to explain transitions and how they come about. The purpose is to initiate development of an explanatory theory for socio-technical transitions, by carrying out an immanent critique of the ontological foundations of the MLP together with a methodological critique. We show that the ontological foundations of the MLP to a large extent inhibits explanatory capacity. The argument is fourfold: since structure and agency are understood as inseparable, (i) the causal influence of material properties are undervalued, and (ii) different degrees of structural constraint and freedom of actors are ignored. As a consequence (iii) transitions are reduced to shifts in the maturity and spread of socio-cognitive rules, without analysis of systemic change. Moreover, (iv) mechanisms are reduced to recurring patterns of events which cannot explain why some transitions fail while others succeed. To remedy these limitations we outline alternative critical realist foundations for transitions theory. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Structure and agency, Socio-technical transitions, Critical realism, Ontology, Explanatory theory
in
Research Policy
volume
47
issue
2
pages
12 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85040068583
ISSN
0048-7333
DOI
10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.12.007
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
934cffa7-fffb-4c01-88d8-110f7631c9cc
date added to LUP
2018-01-08 12:09:40
date last changed
2018-01-21 04:26:41
@article{934cffa7-fffb-4c01-88d8-110f7631c9cc,
  abstract     = {The most prominent framework for studying socio-technical transitions to date is the multi-level perspective (MLP). While appreciated for its flexibility and usefulness for studying socio-technical transitions it has not been without its critics. In this paper we focus on the ontological foundations of the MLP and its (in)ability to explain transitions and how they come about. The purpose is to initiate development of an explanatory theory for socio-technical transitions, by carrying out an immanent critique of the ontological foundations of the MLP together with a methodological critique. We show that the ontological foundations of the MLP to a large extent inhibits explanatory capacity. The argument is fourfold: since structure and agency are understood as inseparable, (i) the causal influence of material properties are undervalued, and (ii) different degrees of structural constraint and freedom of actors are ignored. As a consequence (iii) transitions are reduced to shifts in the maturity and spread of socio-cognitive rules, without analysis of systemic change. Moreover, (iv) mechanisms are reduced to recurring patterns of events which cannot explain why some transitions fail while others succeed. To remedy these limitations we outline alternative critical realist foundations for transitions theory.},
  author       = {Svensson, Oscar and Nikoleris, Alexandra},
  issn         = {0048-7333},
  keyword      = {Structure and agency,Socio-technical transitions,Critical realism,Ontology,Explanatory theory},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {462--473},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Research Policy},
  title        = {Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.12.007},
  volume       = {47},
  year         = {2018},
}