Advanced

A typology of fisheries management tools : Using experience to catalyse greater success

Selig, Elizabeth R; Kleisner, Kristin M.; Ahoobim, Oren; Arocha, Freddy; Cruz-Trinidad, Annabelle; Fujita, Rod; Hara, Mafaniso; Katz, Laure; Mcconney, Patrick and Ratner, Blake D., et al. (2016) In Fish and Fisheries
Abstract

Fisheries provide nutrition and livelihoods for coastal populations, but many fisheries are fully or over-exploited and we lack an approach for analysing which factors affect management tool performance. We conducted a literature review of 390 studies to assess how fisheries characteristics affected management tool performance across both small-scale and large-scale fisheries. We defined success as increased or maintained abundance or biomass, reductions in fishing mortality or improvements in population status. Because the literature only covered a narrow set of biological factors, we also conducted an expert elicitation to create a typology of broader fishery characteristics, enabling conditions and design considerations that affect... (More)

Fisheries provide nutrition and livelihoods for coastal populations, but many fisheries are fully or over-exploited and we lack an approach for analysing which factors affect management tool performance. We conducted a literature review of 390 studies to assess how fisheries characteristics affected management tool performance across both small-scale and large-scale fisheries. We defined success as increased or maintained abundance or biomass, reductions in fishing mortality or improvements in population status. Because the literature only covered a narrow set of biological factors, we also conducted an expert elicitation to create a typology of broader fishery characteristics, enabling conditions and design considerations that affect performance. The literature suggested that the most commonly used management tool in a region was often the most successful, although the scale of success varied. Management tools were more often deemed successful when used in combination, particularly pairings of tools that controlled fishing mortality or effort with spatial management. Examples of successful combinations were the use of catch limits with quotas and limited entry, and marine protected areas with effort restrictions. The most common factors associated with inadequate biological performance were 'structural' issues, including poor design or implementation. The expert-derived typologies revealed strong local leadership, high community involvement and governance capacity as common factors of success across management tool categories (i.e. input, output and technical measures), but the degree of importance varied. Our results are designed to inform selection of appropriate management tools based on empirical data and experience to increase the likelihood of successful fisheries management.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
in press
subject
keywords
Fisheries management, Input controls, Management effectiveness, Output controls, Small-scale fisheries, Spatial management
in
Fish and Fisheries
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:84996503762
  • wos:000400327400008
ISSN
1467-2960
DOI
10.1111/faf.12192
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
94a23e8d-5092-42f0-b237-e5c89a00be76
date added to LUP
2017-02-20 14:05:02
date last changed
2017-09-18 11:33:52
@article{94a23e8d-5092-42f0-b237-e5c89a00be76,
  abstract     = {<p>Fisheries provide nutrition and livelihoods for coastal populations, but many fisheries are fully or over-exploited and we lack an approach for analysing which factors affect management tool performance. We conducted a literature review of 390 studies to assess how fisheries characteristics affected management tool performance across both small-scale and large-scale fisheries. We defined success as increased or maintained abundance or biomass, reductions in fishing mortality or improvements in population status. Because the literature only covered a narrow set of biological factors, we also conducted an expert elicitation to create a typology of broader fishery characteristics, enabling conditions and design considerations that affect performance. The literature suggested that the most commonly used management tool in a region was often the most successful, although the scale of success varied. Management tools were more often deemed successful when used in combination, particularly pairings of tools that controlled fishing mortality or effort with spatial management. Examples of successful combinations were the use of catch limits with quotas and limited entry, and marine protected areas with effort restrictions. The most common factors associated with inadequate biological performance were 'structural' issues, including poor design or implementation. The expert-derived typologies revealed strong local leadership, high community involvement and governance capacity as common factors of success across management tool categories (i.e. input, output and technical measures), but the degree of importance varied. Our results are designed to inform selection of appropriate management tools based on empirical data and experience to increase the likelihood of successful fisheries management.</p>},
  author       = {Selig, Elizabeth R and Kleisner, Kristin M. and Ahoobim, Oren and Arocha, Freddy and Cruz-Trinidad, Annabelle and Fujita, Rod and Hara, Mafaniso and Katz, Laure and Mcconney, Patrick and Ratner, Blake D. and Saavedra-Díaz, Lina M. and Schwarz, Anne Maree and Thiao, Djiga and Torell, Elin and Troëng, Sebastian and Villasante, Sebastian},
  issn         = {1467-2960},
  keyword      = {Fisheries management,Input controls,Management effectiveness,Output controls,Small-scale fisheries,Spatial management},
  language     = {eng},
  publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  series       = {Fish and Fisheries},
  title        = {A typology of fisheries management tools : Using experience to catalyse greater success},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12192},
  year         = {2016},
}