Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected: a 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Little, Paul ; Stuart, Beth ; Moore, Michael ; Coenen, Samuel ; Butler, Christopher C. ; Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek ; Mierzecki, Artur ; Chlabicz, Slawomir ; Torres, Antoni and Almirall, Jordi , et al. (2013) In The Lancet. Infectious Diseases 13(2). p.123-129
Abstract
Background Lower-respiratory-tract infection is one of the most common acute illnesses managed in primary care. Few placebo-controlled studies of antibiotics have been done, and overall effectiveness (particularly in subgroups such as older people) is debated. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection with those of placebo both overall and in patients aged 60 years or older. Methods Patients older than 18 years with acute lower-respiratory-tract infections (cough of <= 28 days' duration) in whom pneumonia was not suspected were randomly assigned (1:1) to either amoxicillin (1 g three times daily for 7 days) or placebo by computer-generated random numbers. Our primary outcome... (More)
Background Lower-respiratory-tract infection is one of the most common acute illnesses managed in primary care. Few placebo-controlled studies of antibiotics have been done, and overall effectiveness (particularly in subgroups such as older people) is debated. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection with those of placebo both overall and in patients aged 60 years or older. Methods Patients older than 18 years with acute lower-respiratory-tract infections (cough of <= 28 days' duration) in whom pneumonia was not suspected were randomly assigned (1:1) to either amoxicillin (1 g three times daily for 7 days) or placebo by computer-generated random numbers. Our primary outcome was duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity in days 2-4 and new or worsening symptoms. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2007-001586-15), UKCRN Portfolio (ID 4175), ISRCTN (52261229), and FWO (G.0274.08N). Findings 1038 patients were assigned to the amoxicillin group and 1023 to the placebo group. Neither duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18; p=0.229) nor mean symptom severity (1.69 with placebo vs 1.62 with amoxicillin; difference 0.07 [95% CI -0.15 to 0.007]; p=0.074) differed significantly between groups. New or worsening symptoms were significantly less common in the amoxicillin group than in the placebo group (162 [15.9%] of 1021 patients vs 194 [19.3%] of 1006; p=0-043; number needed to treat 30). Cases of nausea, rash, or diarrhoea were significantly more common in the amoxidllin group than in the placebo group (number needed to harm 21,95% CI 11-174; p=0.025), and one case of anaphylaxis was noted with amoxicillin. Two patients in the placebo group and one in the ammdcillin group needed to be admitted to hospital; no study-related deaths were noted. We noted no evidence of selective benefit in patients aged 60 years or older (n=595). Interpretation When pneumonia is not suspected clinically, amoxicillin provides little benefit for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care both overall and in patients aged 60 years or more, and causes slight harms. Funding European Commission Framework Programme 6, UK National Institute for Health Research, Barcelona Ciberde Enfermedades Respiratorias, and Research Foundation Flanders. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases
volume
13
issue
2
pages
123 - 129
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000313921900029
  • scopus:84872618707
ISSN
1474-4457
DOI
10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70300-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
94c3c96c-c499-446c-9a75-b40b47954be7 (old id 3591154)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23265995
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:29:14
date last changed
2022-04-20 02:39:29
@article{94c3c96c-c499-446c-9a75-b40b47954be7,
  abstract     = {{Background Lower-respiratory-tract infection is one of the most common acute illnesses managed in primary care. Few placebo-controlled studies of antibiotics have been done, and overall effectiveness (particularly in subgroups such as older people) is debated. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection with those of placebo both overall and in patients aged 60 years or older. Methods Patients older than 18 years with acute lower-respiratory-tract infections (cough of &lt;= 28 days' duration) in whom pneumonia was not suspected were randomly assigned (1:1) to either amoxicillin (1 g three times daily for 7 days) or placebo by computer-generated random numbers. Our primary outcome was duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity in days 2-4 and new or worsening symptoms. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2007-001586-15), UKCRN Portfolio (ID 4175), ISRCTN (52261229), and FWO (G.0274.08N). Findings 1038 patients were assigned to the amoxicillin group and 1023 to the placebo group. Neither duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18; p=0.229) nor mean symptom severity (1.69 with placebo vs 1.62 with amoxicillin; difference 0.07 [95% CI -0.15 to 0.007]; p=0.074) differed significantly between groups. New or worsening symptoms were significantly less common in the amoxicillin group than in the placebo group (162 [15.9%] of 1021 patients vs 194 [19.3%] of 1006; p=0-043; number needed to treat 30). Cases of nausea, rash, or diarrhoea were significantly more common in the amoxidllin group than in the placebo group (number needed to harm 21,95% CI 11-174; p=0.025), and one case of anaphylaxis was noted with amoxicillin. Two patients in the placebo group and one in the ammdcillin group needed to be admitted to hospital; no study-related deaths were noted. We noted no evidence of selective benefit in patients aged 60 years or older (n=595). Interpretation When pneumonia is not suspected clinically, amoxicillin provides little benefit for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care both overall and in patients aged 60 years or more, and causes slight harms. Funding European Commission Framework Programme 6, UK National Institute for Health Research, Barcelona Ciberde Enfermedades Respiratorias, and Research Foundation Flanders.}},
  author       = {{Little, Paul and Stuart, Beth and Moore, Michael and Coenen, Samuel and Butler, Christopher C. and Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek and Mierzecki, Artur and Chlabicz, Slawomir and Torres, Antoni and Almirall, Jordi and Davies, Mel and Schaberg, Tom and Mölstad, Sigvard and Blasi, Francesco and De Sutter, An and Kersnik, Janko and Hupkova, Helena and Touboul, Pia and Hood, Kerenza and Mullee, Mark and O'Reilly, Gilly and Brugman, Curt and Goossens, Herman and Verheij, Theo}},
  issn         = {{1474-4457}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{123--129}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{The Lancet. Infectious Diseases}},
  title        = {{Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected: a 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70300-6}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70300-6}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}