The defeasible nature of coherentist justification
(2007) In Synthese 157(3). p.321-335- Abstract
- The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003, Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press) and Olsson (2005, Against coherence: Truth, probability and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) show that the link between coherence and probability is not as strong as some have supposed. This paper is an attempt to bring out a way in which coherence reasoning nevertheless can be justified, based on the idea that, even if it does not provide an infallible guide to probability, it can give us an indication thereof. It is further shown that this actually is the case, for several of the coherence measures discussed in the literature so far. We also discuss how this affects the possibility to use coherence as a means of... (More)
- The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003, Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press) and Olsson (2005, Against coherence: Truth, probability and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) show that the link between coherence and probability is not as strong as some have supposed. This paper is an attempt to bring out a way in which coherence reasoning nevertheless can be justified, based on the idea that, even if it does not provide an infallible guide to probability, it can give us an indication thereof. It is further shown that this actually is the case, for several of the coherence measures discussed in the literature so far. We also discuss how this affects the possibility to use coherence as a means of epistemic justification. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/950138
- author
- Angere, Staffan LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2007
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- defeasible justification, measure theory, Coherence
- in
- Synthese
- volume
- 157
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 321 - 335
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:34547522465
- ISSN
- 0039-7857
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7b3b19e3-0273-4de3-8912-f8efb7631608 (old id 950138)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:57:21
- date last changed
- 2022-03-22 22:18:35
@article{7b3b19e3-0273-4de3-8912-f8efb7631608, abstract = {{The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003, Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press) and Olsson (2005, Against coherence: Truth, probability and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) show that the link between coherence and probability is not as strong as some have supposed. This paper is an attempt to bring out a way in which coherence reasoning nevertheless can be justified, based on the idea that, even if it does not provide an infallible guide to probability, it can give us an indication thereof. It is further shown that this actually is the case, for several of the coherence measures discussed in the literature so far. We also discuss how this affects the possibility to use coherence as a means of epistemic justification.}}, author = {{Angere, Staffan}}, issn = {{0039-7857}}, keywords = {{defeasible justification; measure theory; Coherence}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{321--335}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, series = {{Synthese}}, title = {{The defeasible nature of coherentist justification}}, volume = {{157}}, year = {{2007}}, }