Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Morphometrical methods as tools for identifying field maple (Acer campestre L.) trees

Wahlsteen, Eric LU (2020) In Feddes Repertorium 131(1). p.72-81
Abstract

Several morphometrical methods were evaluated with the purpose of distinguishing individual maple trees by their samaras and to reveal shape trends. Landmarks for geometric morphometrics gave 97–98% correctly classified trees in a jackknifed confusion matrix from discriminant analysis, fan-positioned landmarks and semilandmarks 92%, linear data 79% and elliptic Fourier analysis 65% correctly classified trees. Several principal component analyses (PCA) where conducted revealing shape trends in the investigated samaras. The linear data revealed change in length and the geometric and Fourier data change in the direction of the samara wing. MANOVA and NPMANOVA revealed significant differences between several group means. The results suggest... (More)

Several morphometrical methods were evaluated with the purpose of distinguishing individual maple trees by their samaras and to reveal shape trends. Landmarks for geometric morphometrics gave 97–98% correctly classified trees in a jackknifed confusion matrix from discriminant analysis, fan-positioned landmarks and semilandmarks 92%, linear data 79% and elliptic Fourier analysis 65% correctly classified trees. Several principal component analyses (PCA) where conducted revealing shape trends in the investigated samaras. The linear data revealed change in length and the geometric and Fourier data change in the direction of the samara wing. MANOVA and NPMANOVA revealed significant differences between several group means. The results suggest that: 1) landmarks may be an adequate method for distinguishing different individuals of maples 2) the main shape change concerns the direction of the samara wing, which may be horizontal, curved upwards or downwards.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Acer campestre, discriminant analysis, morphometrics, principal component analysis, samara
in
Feddes Repertorium
volume
131
issue
1
pages
10 pages
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:85081258778
ISSN
0014-8962
DOI
10.1002/fedr.201900015
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
976b3d54-6595-4703-a6c7-f84004706fd9
date added to LUP
2020-04-01 17:08:57
date last changed
2024-04-03 05:21:32
@article{976b3d54-6595-4703-a6c7-f84004706fd9,
  abstract     = {{<p>Several morphometrical methods were evaluated with the purpose of distinguishing individual maple trees by their samaras and to reveal shape trends. Landmarks for geometric morphometrics gave 97–98% correctly classified trees in a jackknifed confusion matrix from discriminant analysis, fan-positioned landmarks and semilandmarks 92%, linear data 79% and elliptic Fourier analysis 65% correctly classified trees. Several principal component analyses (PCA) where conducted revealing shape trends in the investigated samaras. The linear data revealed change in length and the geometric and Fourier data change in the direction of the samara wing. MANOVA and NPMANOVA revealed significant differences between several group means. The results suggest that: 1) landmarks may be an adequate method for distinguishing different individuals of maples 2) the main shape change concerns the direction of the samara wing, which may be horizontal, curved upwards or downwards.</p>}},
  author       = {{Wahlsteen, Eric}},
  issn         = {{0014-8962}},
  keywords     = {{Acer campestre; discriminant analysis; morphometrics; principal component analysis; samara}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{72--81}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Feddes Repertorium}},
  title        = {{Morphometrical methods as tools for identifying field maple (Acer campestre L.) trees}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fedr.201900015}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/fedr.201900015}},
  volume       = {{131}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}