Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How have waste management policies impacted the flow of municipal waste? : An empirical analysis of 14 European countries

Malek, Wasim ; Mortazavi, Reza ; Cialani, Catia and Nordström, Jonas LU (2023) In Waste Management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology 164. p.84-93
Abstract

Waste management policies aim to divert waste from lower positions on the waste hierarchy such as landfill and incineration to higher positions in the hierarchy such as energy recovery and recycling. However, empirical evaluations of such policies are scarce. This study highlighted the effect of waste management policies on the amount of waste treated with landfill, incineration, energy recovery and recycling by analysing a panel dataset consisting of 14 European countries and the period 1996 to 2018. Findings from a seemingly unrelated regression model suggest that the landfill ban is associated with a decrease in landfill waste, but an increase in incineration, energy recovery and recycling waste. The landfill tax is also correlated... (More)

Waste management policies aim to divert waste from lower positions on the waste hierarchy such as landfill and incineration to higher positions in the hierarchy such as energy recovery and recycling. However, empirical evaluations of such policies are scarce. This study highlighted the effect of waste management policies on the amount of waste treated with landfill, incineration, energy recovery and recycling by analysing a panel dataset consisting of 14 European countries and the period 1996 to 2018. Findings from a seemingly unrelated regression model suggest that the landfill ban is associated with a decrease in landfill waste, but an increase in incineration, energy recovery and recycling waste. The landfill tax is also correlated with an increase in energy recovery waste but, in contrast, it is associated with a reduction in incineration and recycling waste. Meanwhile, the deposit refund scheme is associated with a decrease in the amount of landfill waste. Concerning the effects on total waste generated, regression results from a fixed effects model indicate that the landfill tax and the deposit refund scheme are both correlated with a reduction in the amount of waste generated. These findings contribute to the scarce academic literature evaluating waste management policies and may better inform policy makers on their longer-term implications.

(Less)
Abstract (Swedish)
Waste management policies aim to divert waste from lower positions on the waste hierarchy such as landfill and incineration to higher positions in the hierarchy such as energy recovery and recycling. However, empirical evaluations of such policies are scarce. This study highlighted the effect of waste management policies on the amount of waste treated with landfill, incineration, energy recovery and recycling by analysing a panel dataset consisting of 14 European countries and the period 1996 to 2018. Findings from a seemingly unrelated regression model suggest that the landfill ban is associated with a decrease in landfill waste, but an increase in incineration, energy recovery and recycling waste. The landfill tax is also correlated with... (More)
Waste management policies aim to divert waste from lower positions on the waste hierarchy such as landfill and incineration to higher positions in the hierarchy such as energy recovery and recycling. However, empirical evaluations of such policies are scarce. This study highlighted the effect of waste management policies on the amount of waste treated with landfill, incineration, energy recovery and recycling by analysing a panel dataset consisting of 14 European countries and the period 1996 to 2018. Findings from a seemingly unrelated regression model suggest that the landfill ban is associated with a decrease in landfill waste, but an increase in incineration, energy recovery and recycling waste. The landfill tax is also correlated with an increase in energy recovery waste but, in contrast, it is associated with a reduction in incineration and recycling waste. Meanwhile, the deposit refund scheme is associated with a decrease in the amount of landfill waste. Concerning the effects on total waste
generated, regression results from a fixed effects model indicate that the landfill tax and the deposit refund scheme are both correlated with a reduction in the amount of waste generated. These findings contribute to the scarce academic literature evaluating waste management policies and may better inform policy makers on their longer-term implications. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Waste Management/methods, Waste Disposal Facilities, Incineration/methods, Europe, Recycling/methods, Solid Waste/analysis, Refuse Disposal, Deposit refund scheme, Deposit return scheme, Incineration tax, Landfill ban, Landfill tax, Waste management
in
Waste Management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology
volume
164
pages
10 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85151694108
  • pmid:37037100
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.040
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
id
991a48d6-9870-4b30-a84e-ed05015576e3
date added to LUP
2023-07-31 14:32:40
date last changed
2024-04-20 00:03:40
@article{991a48d6-9870-4b30-a84e-ed05015576e3,
  abstract     = {{<p>Waste management policies aim to divert waste from lower positions on the waste hierarchy such as landfill and incineration to higher positions in the hierarchy such as energy recovery and recycling. However, empirical evaluations of such policies are scarce. This study highlighted the effect of waste management policies on the amount of waste treated with landfill, incineration, energy recovery and recycling by analysing a panel dataset consisting of 14 European countries and the period 1996 to 2018. Findings from a seemingly unrelated regression model suggest that the landfill ban is associated with a decrease in landfill waste, but an increase in incineration, energy recovery and recycling waste. The landfill tax is also correlated with an increase in energy recovery waste but, in contrast, it is associated with a reduction in incineration and recycling waste. Meanwhile, the deposit refund scheme is associated with a decrease in the amount of landfill waste. Concerning the effects on total waste generated, regression results from a fixed effects model indicate that the landfill tax and the deposit refund scheme are both correlated with a reduction in the amount of waste generated. These findings contribute to the scarce academic literature evaluating waste management policies and may better inform policy makers on their longer-term implications.</p>}},
  author       = {{Malek, Wasim and Mortazavi, Reza and Cialani, Catia and Nordström, Jonas}},
  issn         = {{0956-053X}},
  keywords     = {{Waste Management/methods; Waste Disposal Facilities; Incineration/methods; Europe; Recycling/methods; Solid Waste/analysis; Refuse Disposal; Deposit refund scheme; Deposit return scheme; Incineration tax; Landfill ban; Landfill tax; Waste management}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{06}},
  pages        = {{84--93}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Waste Management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology}},
  title        = {{How have waste management policies impacted the flow of municipal waste? : An empirical analysis of 14 European countries}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.040}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.040}},
  volume       = {{164}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}