Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Comparison of dynamical cores for NWP models : Comparison of COSMO and Dune

Brdar, Slavko ; Baldauf, Michael ; Dedner, Andreas and Klöfkorn, Robert LU orcid (2013) In Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 27(3-4). p.453-472
Abstract

We present a range of numerical tests comparing the dynamical cores of the operationally used numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO and the university code Dune, focusing on their efficiency and accuracy for solving benchmark test cases for NWP. The dynamical core of COSMO is based on a finite difference method whereas the Dune core is based on a Discontinuous Galerkin method. Both dynamical cores are briefly introduced stating possible advantages and pitfalls of the different approaches. Their efficiency and effectiveness is investigated, based on three numerical test cases, which require solving the compressible viscous and non-viscous Euler equations. The test cases include the density current (Straka et al. in Int J Numer... (More)

We present a range of numerical tests comparing the dynamical cores of the operationally used numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO and the university code Dune, focusing on their efficiency and accuracy for solving benchmark test cases for NWP. The dynamical core of COSMO is based on a finite difference method whereas the Dune core is based on a Discontinuous Galerkin method. Both dynamical cores are briefly introduced stating possible advantages and pitfalls of the different approaches. Their efficiency and effectiveness is investigated, based on three numerical test cases, which require solving the compressible viscous and non-viscous Euler equations. The test cases include the density current (Straka et al. in Int J Numer Methods Fluids 17:1-22, 1993), the inertia gravity (Skamarock and Klemp in Mon Weather Rev 122:2623-2630, 1994), and the linear hydrostatic mountain waves of (Bonaventura in J Comput Phys 158:186-213, 2000).

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Compressible flow, Density current, Discontinuous Galerkin, Euler, Finite differences, Inertia gravity, Navier-Stokes
in
Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics
volume
27
issue
3-4
pages
20 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:84878315382
ISSN
0935-4964
DOI
10.1007/s00162-012-0264-z
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
9d012c20-30f5-4825-97bd-ca29c3d07a6c
date added to LUP
2021-02-10 14:03:37
date last changed
2022-04-11 08:01:22
@article{9d012c20-30f5-4825-97bd-ca29c3d07a6c,
  abstract     = {{<p>We present a range of numerical tests comparing the dynamical cores of the operationally used numerical weather prediction (NWP) model COSMO and the university code Dune, focusing on their efficiency and accuracy for solving benchmark test cases for NWP. The dynamical core of COSMO is based on a finite difference method whereas the Dune core is based on a Discontinuous Galerkin method. Both dynamical cores are briefly introduced stating possible advantages and pitfalls of the different approaches. Their efficiency and effectiveness is investigated, based on three numerical test cases, which require solving the compressible viscous and non-viscous Euler equations. The test cases include the density current (Straka et al. in Int J Numer Methods Fluids 17:1-22, 1993), the inertia gravity (Skamarock and Klemp in Mon Weather Rev 122:2623-2630, 1994), and the linear hydrostatic mountain waves of (Bonaventura in J Comput Phys 158:186-213, 2000).</p>}},
  author       = {{Brdar, Slavko and Baldauf, Michael and Dedner, Andreas and Klöfkorn, Robert}},
  issn         = {{0935-4964}},
  keywords     = {{Compressible flow; Density current; Discontinuous Galerkin; Euler; Finite differences; Inertia gravity; Navier-Stokes}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3-4}},
  pages        = {{453--472}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics}},
  title        = {{Comparison of dynamical cores for NWP models : Comparison of COSMO and Dune}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00162-012-0264-z}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00162-012-0264-z}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}