Advanced

Qu’est-ce qu’on fait de ce qui dépasse? : Réflexions sur le classement générique de la matière orale

Bacquin, Mari LU and Zola Christensen, Robert LU (2014) In Synergies Pays Scandinaves p.23-35
Abstract
In this article, in the light of the important epistemological changes in human sciences since the 80’s, which had the merit of clarifying the foundations of modern scientific nature, we focus on the difficulties in classifying the orally transmitted material. We show, that the question is not so much what we talk about, when we talk about genres, but how we talk about it. We demonstrate that the disagreements among researchers often emerge due to different ways of using the terminologies on the material, rather than different ways of actually apprehending the genres. The path to consensus might be situated in between essentialism and nominalism.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
alternative title
What to do when it doesn’t fit? : Reflections on generic classification in oral material
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
genreklassificering, medeltida litteratur, hjältedikt, medeltidsfranska, epistemologi, folkloristik, litteraturvetenskap, genre, classification, oral material, epistemology, terminology, medieval literature
in
Synergies Pays Scandinaves
issue
9
pages
13 pages
publisher
GERFLINT, Aarhus, Denmark
ISSN
1901-3809
language
French
LU publication?
yes
id
9e3ad489-b1ad-45a5-b718-69090f4cc16f
alternative location
http://gerflint.fr/Base/Paysscandinaves9/bacquin_zola_christensen.pdf
date added to LUP
2017-02-15 12:30:58
date last changed
2017-02-21 11:23:07
@article{9e3ad489-b1ad-45a5-b718-69090f4cc16f,
  abstract     = {In this article, in the light of the important epistemological changes in human sciences since the 80’s, which had the merit of clarifying the foundations of modern scientific nature, we focus on the difficulties in classifying the orally transmitted material. We show, that the question is not so much what we talk about, when we talk about genres, but how we talk about it. We demonstrate that the disagreements among researchers often emerge due to different ways of using the terminologies on the material, rather than different ways of actually apprehending the genres. The path to consensus might be  situated in between essentialism and nominalism.},
  author       = {Bacquin, Mari and Zola Christensen, Robert},
  issn         = {1901-3809},
  keyword      = {genreklassificering,medeltida litteratur,hjältedikt,medeltidsfranska,epistemologi,folkloristik,litteraturvetenskap,genre,classification,oral material,epistemology,terminology,medieval literature},
  language     = {fre},
  number       = {9},
  pages        = {23--35},
  publisher    = {GERFLINT, Aarhus, Denmark},
  series       = {Synergies Pays Scandinaves},
  title        = {Qu’est-ce qu’on fait de ce qui dépasse? : Réflexions sur le classement générique de la matière orale},
  year         = {2014},
}