High-pressure tuning of primary photochemistry in bacterial photosynthesis : membrane-bound versus detergent-isolated reaction centers
(2020) In Photosynthesis Research 144(2). p.209-220- Abstract
While photosynthesis thrives at close to normal pressures and temperatures, it is presently well known that life is similarly commonplace in the hostile environments of the deep seas as well as around hydrothermal vents. It is thus imperative to understand how key biological processes perform under extreme conditions of high pressures and temperatures. Herein, comparative steady-state and picosecond time-resolved spectroscopic studies were performed on membrane-bound and detergent-purified forms of a YM210W mutant reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides under modulating conditions of high hydrostatic pressure applied at ambient temperature. A previously established breakage of the lone hydrogen bond formed between the RC... (More)
While photosynthesis thrives at close to normal pressures and temperatures, it is presently well known that life is similarly commonplace in the hostile environments of the deep seas as well as around hydrothermal vents. It is thus imperative to understand how key biological processes perform under extreme conditions of high pressures and temperatures. Herein, comparative steady-state and picosecond time-resolved spectroscopic studies were performed on membrane-bound and detergent-purified forms of a YM210W mutant reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides under modulating conditions of high hydrostatic pressure applied at ambient temperature. A previously established breakage of the lone hydrogen bond formed between the RC primary donor and the protein scaffold was shown to take place in the membrane-bound RC at an almost 3 kbar higher pressure than in the purified RC, confirming the stabilizing role of the lipid environment for membrane proteins. The main change in the multi-exponential decay of excited primary donor emission across the experimental 10 kbar pressure range involved an over two-fold continuous acceleration, the kinetics becoming increasingly mono-exponential. The fastest component of the emission decay, thought to be largely governed by the rate of primary charge separation, was distinctly slower in the membrane-bound RC than in the purified RC. The change in character of the emission decay with pressure was explained by the contribution of charge recombination to emission decreasing with pressure as a result of an increasing free energy gap between the charge-separated and excited primary donor states. Finally, it was demonstrated that, in contrast to a long-term experimental paradigm, adding a combination of sodium ascorbate and phenazine methosulfate to the protein solution potentially distorts natural photochemistry in bacterial RCs.
(Less)
- author
- Timpmann, Kõu ; Jalviste, Erko ; Chenchiliyan, Manoop LU ; Kangur, Liina ; Jones, Michael R. and Freiberg, Arvi
- publishing date
- 2020-05-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Electron transfer, High hydrostatic pressure, Photosynthesis, Primary processes, Reaction center, YM210W mutant
- in
- Photosynthesis Research
- volume
- 144
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 12 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32095925
- scopus:85080027172
- ISSN
- 0166-8595
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11120-020-00724-z
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
- id
- 9f755e39-9822-4c36-b284-6fd61aa0cb7e
- date added to LUP
- 2023-06-16 10:35:40
- date last changed
- 2024-03-08 02:14:04
@article{9f755e39-9822-4c36-b284-6fd61aa0cb7e,
abstract = {{<p>While photosynthesis thrives at close to normal pressures and temperatures, it is presently well known that life is similarly commonplace in the hostile environments of the deep seas as well as around hydrothermal vents. It is thus imperative to understand how key biological processes perform under extreme conditions of high pressures and temperatures. Herein, comparative steady-state and picosecond time-resolved spectroscopic studies were performed on membrane-bound and detergent-purified forms of a YM210W mutant reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides under modulating conditions of high hydrostatic pressure applied at ambient temperature. A previously established breakage of the lone hydrogen bond formed between the RC primary donor and the protein scaffold was shown to take place in the membrane-bound RC at an almost 3 kbar higher pressure than in the purified RC, confirming the stabilizing role of the lipid environment for membrane proteins. The main change in the multi-exponential decay of excited primary donor emission across the experimental 10 kbar pressure range involved an over two-fold continuous acceleration, the kinetics becoming increasingly mono-exponential. The fastest component of the emission decay, thought to be largely governed by the rate of primary charge separation, was distinctly slower in the membrane-bound RC than in the purified RC. The change in character of the emission decay with pressure was explained by the contribution of charge recombination to emission decreasing with pressure as a result of an increasing free energy gap between the charge-separated and excited primary donor states. Finally, it was demonstrated that, in contrast to a long-term experimental paradigm, adding a combination of sodium ascorbate and phenazine methosulfate to the protein solution potentially distorts natural photochemistry in bacterial RCs.</p>}},
author = {{Timpmann, Kõu and Jalviste, Erko and Chenchiliyan, Manoop and Kangur, Liina and Jones, Michael R. and Freiberg, Arvi}},
issn = {{0166-8595}},
keywords = {{Electron transfer; High hydrostatic pressure; Photosynthesis; Primary processes; Reaction center; YM210W mutant}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{05}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{209--220}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Photosynthesis Research}},
title = {{High-pressure tuning of primary photochemistry in bacterial photosynthesis : membrane-bound versus detergent-isolated reaction centers}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11120-020-00724-z}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11120-020-00724-z}},
volume = {{144}},
year = {{2020}},
}