Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Media reporting on Small Modular Reactors in Sweden - benefits, risks and actors involved

Thelander, Åsa LU orcid and Rahm, Henrik (2025) ECOSENS: Futures for nuclear energy?
Abstract
This study focuses on the introduction of new nuclear, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Sweden. The Swedish Government has decided on a revival for nuclear energy where SMRs are an important contribution to reach the goal of a total output of at least 2 500 MW by 2035. In this stage when much is unclear about the re-introduction and SMRs are under development media is an important agenda setter. The framing of the technology in terms of benefits, risks, uncertainties inform possible understanding of the technology. Positions can be expressed by different actors and can also become a way for different actors to position themselves, create alliances and marginalize competing messages. This presentation is based on an analysis of... (More)
This study focuses on the introduction of new nuclear, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Sweden. The Swedish Government has decided on a revival for nuclear energy where SMRs are an important contribution to reach the goal of a total output of at least 2 500 MW by 2035. In this stage when much is unclear about the re-introduction and SMRs are under development media is an important agenda setter. The framing of the technology in terms of benefits, risks, uncertainties inform possible understanding of the technology. Positions can be expressed by different actors and can also become a way for different actors to position themselves, create alliances and marginalize competing messages. This presentation is based on an analysis of the framing of SMRs in Swedish media particularly how benefits and risks are articulated and which actors participate in shaping the image. To this end a content analysis of Swedish news media from 2020 until 2024 is conducted. The study shows how the character of the reporting changes over time but overall SMRs are framed as better and different than existing nuclear power plants and as a solution to contemporary challenges such as energy security, climate crisis and high prices on energy. Benefits rather than risks are covered. The reporting is also characterised by fuzziness; terminology shifts and benefits of SMRs are confused with generation IV nuclear reactors. Taken together the frame makes it hard to understand SMRs in general and risks in particular. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
alternative title
Medierapportering om små modulära reaktorer - fördelar, risker och aktörer
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Nuclear energy, Small Modular Reactors, Media
conference name
ECOSENS: Futures for nuclear energy?
conference location
Milan, Italy
conference dates
2025-09-08 - 2025-09-09
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a1ed6bad-4e8d-4c83-8b70-972aee67e754
alternative location
https://ecosens-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Book-of-Abstracts_revised_with-recommendations_final.pdf
date added to LUP
2025-09-17 14:35:15
date last changed
2025-09-18 11:06:44
@misc{a1ed6bad-4e8d-4c83-8b70-972aee67e754,
  abstract     = {{This study focuses on the introduction of new nuclear, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Sweden. The Swedish Government has decided on a revival for nuclear energy where SMRs are an important contribution to reach the goal of a total output of at least 2 500 MW by 2035. In this stage when much is unclear about the re-introduction and SMRs are under development media is an important agenda setter. The framing of the technology in terms of benefits, risks, uncertainties inform possible understanding of the technology. Positions can be expressed by different actors and can also become a way for different actors to position themselves, create alliances and marginalize competing messages. This presentation is based on an analysis of the framing of SMRs in Swedish media particularly how benefits and risks are articulated and which actors participate in shaping the image. To this end a content analysis of Swedish news media from 2020 until 2024 is conducted. The study shows how the character of the reporting changes over time but overall SMRs are framed as better and different than existing nuclear power plants and as a solution to contemporary challenges such as energy security, climate crisis and high prices on energy. Benefits rather than risks are covered. The reporting is also characterised by fuzziness; terminology shifts and benefits of SMRs are confused with generation IV nuclear reactors. Taken together the frame makes it hard to understand SMRs in general and risks in particular.}},
  author       = {{Thelander, Åsa and Rahm, Henrik}},
  keywords     = {{Nuclear energy; Small Modular Reactors; Media}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{09}},
  title        = {{Media reporting on Small Modular Reactors in Sweden - benefits, risks and actors involved}},
  url          = {{https://ecosens-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Book-of-Abstracts_revised_with-recommendations_final.pdf}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}