Feedback gap and strategies for handling criticism in early surgical career
(2025) In Surgery Open Science 28. p.81-88- Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore experiences and challenges in handling feedback and criticism among early career surgeons. Design: This study is part of a prospective, exploratory, longitudinal study evaluating surgical residents throughout residency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical doctors applying to a locum or residency position in a surgical specialty. Analysis was performed using a cross-sectional thematic analysis. Setting: Departments in general surgery, urology, and pediatric surgery at seven hospitals in Sweden. Participants: Contact information to applicants interviewed for a locum or resident position at the included departments were forwarded to the research group. The research group... (More)
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore experiences and challenges in handling feedback and criticism among early career surgeons. Design: This study is part of a prospective, exploratory, longitudinal study evaluating surgical residents throughout residency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical doctors applying to a locum or residency position in a surgical specialty. Analysis was performed using a cross-sectional thematic analysis. Setting: Departments in general surgery, urology, and pediatric surgery at seven hospitals in Sweden. Participants: Contact information to applicants interviewed for a locum or resident position at the included departments were forwarded to the research group. The research group contacted applicants for inclusion and 50 were included. Results: Four themes were constructed in relation to the participants' management strategies and experiences: 1) reflection and processing of criticism, 2) emotional response to criticism, 3) cautious feedback culture, and 4) navigating criticism in a hierarchical system. Conclusion: This study revealed barriers to an effective feedback culture in a pool of applicants for a residency or locum position in surgical disciplines. A culture of reluctance to give feedback was a strong and common denominator. A process of filtering feedback could possibly be a method of survival and thriving in the contemporary workplace. Suggestions and initiatives to change the feedback culture are proposed.
(Less)
- author
- Pedersen, Hanne
LU
; Tejera, Alexander
LU
; Mathieu, Christopher
LU
; Johansson, Britt Marie
LU
; Anderberg, Magnus
LU
and Hagelsteen, Kristine
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Feedback, Feedback culture, Learning environment, Resident, Surgery
- in
- Surgery Open Science
- volume
- 28
- pages
- 81 - 88
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105022867857
- pmid:41399724
- ISSN
- 2589-8450
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.11.005
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors
- id
- a232abd6-3216-4f8b-9df0-d24a87bb229a
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-18 09:51:05
- date last changed
- 2025-12-19 03:33:51
@article{a232abd6-3216-4f8b-9df0-d24a87bb229a,
abstract = {{<p>Objective: The aim of this study was to explore experiences and challenges in handling feedback and criticism among early career surgeons. Design: This study is part of a prospective, exploratory, longitudinal study evaluating surgical residents throughout residency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical doctors applying to a locum or residency position in a surgical specialty. Analysis was performed using a cross-sectional thematic analysis. Setting: Departments in general surgery, urology, and pediatric surgery at seven hospitals in Sweden. Participants: Contact information to applicants interviewed for a locum or resident position at the included departments were forwarded to the research group. The research group contacted applicants for inclusion and 50 were included. Results: Four themes were constructed in relation to the participants' management strategies and experiences: 1) reflection and processing of criticism, 2) emotional response to criticism, 3) cautious feedback culture, and 4) navigating criticism in a hierarchical system. Conclusion: This study revealed barriers to an effective feedback culture in a pool of applicants for a residency or locum position in surgical disciplines. A culture of reluctance to give feedback was a strong and common denominator. A process of filtering feedback could possibly be a method of survival and thriving in the contemporary workplace. Suggestions and initiatives to change the feedback culture are proposed.</p>}},
author = {{Pedersen, Hanne and Tejera, Alexander and Mathieu, Christopher and Johansson, Britt Marie and Anderberg, Magnus and Hagelsteen, Kristine}},
issn = {{2589-8450}},
keywords = {{Feedback; Feedback culture; Learning environment; Resident; Surgery}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{81--88}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Surgery Open Science}},
title = {{Feedback gap and strategies for handling criticism in early surgical career}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2025.11.005}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.sopen.2025.11.005}},
volume = {{28}},
year = {{2025}},
}