Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Railway maintenance windows : Discrepancies between planning and practice in Sweden

Ivina, Daria LU orcid and Palmqvist, Carl-William LU orcid (2023) In Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 22.
Abstract
Efficient and timely maintenance is essential for the robust operation of infrastructure across all types of transport. In the railway sector, track maintenance presents unique challenges. Specifically, some maintenance tasks require track closures, which can disrupt train schedules. Coordinating these closures with regular train operations makes the scheduling process complicated. To ensure sufficient time for maintenance and prevent conflicts with train operations, the Swedish Transport Administration introduced “maintenance windows.” Maintenance windows, ranging from two to six hours, are periods designated for maintenance, with the track free from train operations. They are set before finalizing the annual train timetable. In this... (More)
Efficient and timely maintenance is essential for the robust operation of infrastructure across all types of transport. In the railway sector, track maintenance presents unique challenges. Specifically, some maintenance tasks require track closures, which can disrupt train schedules. Coordinating these closures with regular train operations makes the scheduling process complicated. To ensure sufficient time for maintenance and prevent conflicts with train operations, the Swedish Transport Administration introduced “maintenance windows.” Maintenance windows, ranging from two to six hours, are periods designated for maintenance, with the track free from train operations. They are set before finalizing the annual train timetable. In this study, we examined the practical application of maintenance windows on a railway line in Southern Sweden from 2019 to 2020. Our findings reveal that while 10% of the total line capacity was allocated for maintenance windows, 11% of the capacity was used for maintenance. Alarmingly, 68% of trackwork occurred outside maintenance windows, and only 34% of the reserved maintenance window capacity was utilized. There is a significant discrepancy between the time and location reserved for maintenance windows and their actual utilization. To address this, we propose aligning maintenance windows more closely with contractor needs by 1) incorporating maintenance windows on the weekends, 2) making maintenance windows available closer to the end of the planning horizon, 3) extending the duration of some maintenance windows, and 4) designing and integrating incentives to encourage contractors to operate within planned maintenance windows.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Railway Maintenance window Possession Trackwork Scheduling
in
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
volume
22
pages
11 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85172872428
ISSN
2590-1982
DOI
10.1016/j.trip.2023.100927
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a38d9c94-eeb8-47bd-978f-6db6b4e1fd1d
date added to LUP
2023-09-30 18:47:21
date last changed
2024-02-11 21:21:05
@article{a38d9c94-eeb8-47bd-978f-6db6b4e1fd1d,
  abstract     = {{Efficient and timely maintenance is essential for the robust operation of infrastructure across all types of transport. In the railway sector, track maintenance presents unique challenges. Specifically, some maintenance tasks require track closures, which can disrupt train schedules. Coordinating these closures with regular train operations makes the scheduling process complicated. To ensure sufficient time for maintenance and prevent conflicts with train operations, the Swedish Transport Administration introduced “maintenance windows.” Maintenance windows, ranging from two to six hours, are periods designated for maintenance, with the track free from train operations. They are set before finalizing the annual train timetable. In this study, we examined the practical application of maintenance windows on a railway line in Southern Sweden from 2019 to 2020. Our findings reveal that while 10% of the total line capacity was allocated for maintenance windows, 11% of the capacity was used for maintenance. Alarmingly, 68% of trackwork occurred outside maintenance windows, and only 34% of the reserved maintenance window capacity was utilized. There is a significant discrepancy between the time and location reserved for maintenance windows and their actual utilization. To address this, we propose aligning maintenance windows more closely with contractor needs by 1) incorporating maintenance windows on the weekends, 2) making maintenance windows available closer to the end of the planning horizon, 3) extending the duration of some maintenance windows, and 4) designing and integrating incentives to encourage contractors to operate within planned maintenance windows.<br/><br/>}},
  author       = {{Ivina, Daria and Palmqvist, Carl-William}},
  issn         = {{2590-1982}},
  keywords     = {{Railway Maintenance window Possession Trackwork Scheduling}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{09}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives}},
  title        = {{Railway maintenance windows : Discrepancies between planning and practice in Sweden}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100927}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.trip.2023.100927}},
  volume       = {{22}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}