Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Precipitation phase uncertainty in cold region conceptual models resulting from meteorological forcing time-step intervals

Feiccabrino, James M. LU (2020) In Hydrology Research 51(2). p.180-187
Abstract

Precipitation phase determination is a known source of uncertainty in surface-based hydrological, ecological, safety, and climate models. This is primarily due to the surface precipitation phase being a result of cloud and atmospheric properties not measured at surface meteorological or hydrological stations. Adding to the uncertainty, many conceptual hydrological models use a 24-h average air temperature to determine the precipitation phase. However, meteorological changes to atmospheric properties that control the precipitation phase often substantially change at sub-daily timescales. Model uncertainty (precipitation phase error) using air temperature (AT), dew-point temperature (DP), and wet-bulb temperature (WB) thresholds were... (More)

Precipitation phase determination is a known source of uncertainty in surface-based hydrological, ecological, safety, and climate models. This is primarily due to the surface precipitation phase being a result of cloud and atmospheric properties not measured at surface meteorological or hydrological stations. Adding to the uncertainty, many conceptual hydrological models use a 24-h average air temperature to determine the precipitation phase. However, meteorological changes to atmospheric properties that control the precipitation phase often substantially change at sub-daily timescales. Model uncertainty (precipitation phase error) using air temperature (AT), dew-point temperature (DP), and wet-bulb temperature (WB) thresholds were compared using averaged and time of observation readings at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h periods. Precipitation phase uncertainty grew 35–65% from the use of 1–24 h data. Within a sub-dataset of observations occurring between AT -6 and 6 °C representing 57% of annual precipitation, misclassified precipitation was 7.9% 1 h and 11.8% 24 h. Of note, there was also little difference between 1 and 3 h uncertainty, typical time steps for surface meteorological observations.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Conceptual models, Precipitation phase, Snow, Snow model, Temperature threshold
in
Hydrology Research
volume
51
issue
2
pages
8 pages
publisher
IWA Publishing
external identifiers
  • scopus:85087279229
ISSN
1998-9563
DOI
10.2166/nh.2020.080
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a3b037de-cbdd-45a9-82c9-1ea6a08b1510
date added to LUP
2020-07-16 13:38:29
date last changed
2022-04-18 23:36:20
@article{a3b037de-cbdd-45a9-82c9-1ea6a08b1510,
  abstract     = {{<p>Precipitation phase determination is a known source of uncertainty in surface-based hydrological, ecological, safety, and climate models. This is primarily due to the surface precipitation phase being a result of cloud and atmospheric properties not measured at surface meteorological or hydrological stations. Adding to the uncertainty, many conceptual hydrological models use a 24-h average air temperature to determine the precipitation phase. However, meteorological changes to atmospheric properties that control the precipitation phase often substantially change at sub-daily timescales. Model uncertainty (precipitation phase error) using air temperature (AT), dew-point temperature (DP), and wet-bulb temperature (WB) thresholds were compared using averaged and time of observation readings at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h periods. Precipitation phase uncertainty grew 35–65% from the use of 1–24 h data. Within a sub-dataset of observations occurring between AT -6 and 6 <sup>°</sup>C representing 57% of annual precipitation, misclassified precipitation was 7.9% 1 h and 11.8% 24 h. Of note, there was also little difference between 1 and 3 h uncertainty, typical time steps for surface meteorological observations.</p>}},
  author       = {{Feiccabrino, James M.}},
  issn         = {{1998-9563}},
  keywords     = {{Conceptual models; Precipitation phase; Snow; Snow model; Temperature threshold}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{180--187}},
  publisher    = {{IWA Publishing}},
  series       = {{Hydrology Research}},
  title        = {{Precipitation phase uncertainty in cold region conceptual models resulting from meteorological forcing time-step intervals}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.080}},
  doi          = {{10.2166/nh.2020.080}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}