Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the occupational balance questionnaire
Yamada, Yuki ; Kobayashi, Norikazu ; Wagman, Petra and Håkansson, Carita LU
(2025)
In British Journal of Occupational Therapy
88(7).
p.454-462
- Abstract
Introduction: Occupational balance, a foundational concept in occupational therapy and science, plays a critical role in enhancing health and well-being. Recent studies have revealed its association with epidemiological factors. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11 (OBQ11-J). Methods: Adhering to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments and Rasch Reporting Guidelines for Rehabilitation Research, analyses were conducted on the OBQ11-J using a cohort of 462 generally healthy individuals. Results: The mean OBQ11-J score was 17.7 ± 5.1, ranging from 2 to 33. Two items (Items 1 and 9) exhibited ceiling effects. The... (More)
Introduction: Occupational balance, a foundational concept in occupational therapy and science, plays a critical role in enhancing health and well-being. Recent studies have revealed its association with epidemiological factors. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11 (OBQ11-J). Methods: Adhering to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments and Rasch Reporting Guidelines for Rehabilitation Research, analyses were conducted on the OBQ11-J using a cohort of 462 generally healthy individuals. Results: The mean OBQ11-J score was 17.7 ± 5.1, ranging from 2 to 33. Two items (Items 1 and 9) exhibited ceiling effects. The 4-point rating scale was validated. Although two items (Items 1 and 10) did not strictly conform to the Rasch model, the overall one-dimensionality and single-factor structures were supported. This confirms the structural validity of the OBQ11-J with its 11 items and 4 rating stages. Reliability, assessed through internal consistency, person separation reliability and test–retest reliability, further affirmed the instrument’s robustness. Conclusion: The OBQ11-J demonstrated validity and reliability in a sample of healthy Japanese individuals. Future investigations should establish normative values for the Japanese population and examine criterion-related validity, responsiveness and interpretability.
(Less)
- author
- Yamada, Yuki
; Kobayashi, Norikazu
; Wagman, Petra
and Håkansson, Carita
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Occupational balance, occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ), psychometrics, reliability, validity
- in
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- volume
- 88
- issue
- 7
- pages
- 454 - 462
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105002710451
- pmid:40599217
- ISSN
- 0308-0226
- DOI
- 10.1177/03080226251329771
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a494592a-6ddb-42bc-8b38-36fd87bddb8e
- date added to LUP
- 2025-09-01 10:51:52
- date last changed
- 2025-09-29 13:53:17
@article{a494592a-6ddb-42bc-8b38-36fd87bddb8e,
abstract = {{<p>Introduction: Occupational balance, a foundational concept in occupational therapy and science, plays a critical role in enhancing health and well-being. Recent studies have revealed its association with epidemiological factors. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11 (OBQ11-J). Methods: Adhering to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments and Rasch Reporting Guidelines for Rehabilitation Research, analyses were conducted on the OBQ11-J using a cohort of 462 generally healthy individuals. Results: The mean OBQ11-J score was 17.7 ± 5.1, ranging from 2 to 33. Two items (Items 1 and 9) exhibited ceiling effects. The 4-point rating scale was validated. Although two items (Items 1 and 10) did not strictly conform to the Rasch model, the overall one-dimensionality and single-factor structures were supported. This confirms the structural validity of the OBQ11-J with its 11 items and 4 rating stages. Reliability, assessed through internal consistency, person separation reliability and test–retest reliability, further affirmed the instrument’s robustness. Conclusion: The OBQ11-J demonstrated validity and reliability in a sample of healthy Japanese individuals. Future investigations should establish normative values for the Japanese population and examine criterion-related validity, responsiveness and interpretability.</p>}},
author = {{Yamada, Yuki and Kobayashi, Norikazu and Wagman, Petra and Håkansson, Carita}},
issn = {{0308-0226}},
keywords = {{Occupational balance; occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ); psychometrics; reliability; validity}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{7}},
pages = {{454--462}},
publisher = {{SAGE Publications}},
series = {{British Journal of Occupational Therapy}},
title = {{Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the occupational balance questionnaire}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03080226251329771}},
doi = {{10.1177/03080226251329771}},
volume = {{88}},
year = {{2025}},
}