Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes

Morganella, Sandro ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Glodzik, Dominik ; Zou, Xueqing ; Davies, Helen ; Staaf, Johan LU orcid ; Sieuwerts, Anieta M. ; Brinkman, Arie B. ; Martin, Sancha and Ramakrishna, Manasa , et al. (2016) In Nature Communications 7.
Abstract

Somatic mutations in human cancers show unevenness in genomic distribution that correlate with aspects of genome structure and function. These mutations are, however, generated by multiple mutational processes operating through the cellular lineage between the fertilized egg and the cancer cell, each composed of specific DNA damage and repair components and leaving its own characteristic mutational signature on the genome. Using somatic mutation catalogues from 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences, here we show that each of 12 base substitution, 2 insertion/deletion (indel) and 6 rearrangement mutational signatures present in breast tissue, exhibit distinct relationships with genomic features relating to transcription, DNA... (More)

Somatic mutations in human cancers show unevenness in genomic distribution that correlate with aspects of genome structure and function. These mutations are, however, generated by multiple mutational processes operating through the cellular lineage between the fertilized egg and the cancer cell, each composed of specific DNA damage and repair components and leaving its own characteristic mutational signature on the genome. Using somatic mutation catalogues from 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences, here we show that each of 12 base substitution, 2 insertion/deletion (indel) and 6 rearrangement mutational signatures present in breast tissue, exhibit distinct relationships with genomic features relating to transcription, DNA replication and chromatin organization. This signature-based approach permits visualization of the genomic distribution of mutational processes associated with APOBEC enzymes, mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombinational repair deficiency, as well as mutational processes of unknown aetiology. Furthermore, it highlights mechanistic insights including a putative replication-dependent mechanism of APOBEC-related mutagenesis.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Nature Communications
volume
7
article number
11383
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • scopus:84965121461
  • pmid:27136393
  • wos:000375223100001
ISSN
2041-1723
DOI
10.1038/ncomms11383
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ab43a332-5aec-4446-bde6-09b9546317f5
date added to LUP
2016-09-29 08:49:56
date last changed
2024-06-28 15:58:24
@article{ab43a332-5aec-4446-bde6-09b9546317f5,
  abstract     = {{<p>Somatic mutations in human cancers show unevenness in genomic distribution that correlate with aspects of genome structure and function. These mutations are, however, generated by multiple mutational processes operating through the cellular lineage between the fertilized egg and the cancer cell, each composed of specific DNA damage and repair components and leaving its own characteristic mutational signature on the genome. Using somatic mutation catalogues from 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences, here we show that each of 12 base substitution, 2 insertion/deletion (indel) and 6 rearrangement mutational signatures present in breast tissue, exhibit distinct relationships with genomic features relating to transcription, DNA replication and chromatin organization. This signature-based approach permits visualization of the genomic distribution of mutational processes associated with APOBEC enzymes, mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombinational repair deficiency, as well as mutational processes of unknown aetiology. Furthermore, it highlights mechanistic insights including a putative replication-dependent mechanism of APOBEC-related mutagenesis.</p>}},
  author       = {{Morganella, Sandro and Alexandrov, Ludmil B. and Glodzik, Dominik and Zou, Xueqing and Davies, Helen and Staaf, Johan and Sieuwerts, Anieta M. and Brinkman, Arie B. and Martin, Sancha and Ramakrishna, Manasa and Butler, Adam and Kim, Hyung Yong and Borg, Åke and Sotiriou, Christos and Futreal, P. Andrew and Campbell, Peter J. and Span, Paul N. and Van Laere, Steven and Lakhani, Sunil R. and Eyfjord, Jorunn E. and Thompson, Alastair M. and Stunnenberg, Hendrik G. and Van De Vijver, Marc J. and Martens, John W M and Børresen-Dale, Anne Lise and Richardson, Andrea L. and Kong, Gu and Thomas, Gilles and Sale, Julian and Rada, Cristina and Stratton, Michael R. and Birney, Ewan and Nik-Zainal, Serena}},
  issn         = {{2041-1723}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{05}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{Nature Communications}},
  title        = {{The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11383}},
  doi          = {{10.1038/ncomms11383}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}