Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data
(2020) In Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 84(4). p.2231-2245- Abstract
Purpose: Three-dimensional, time-resolved blood flow measurement (4D-flow) is a powerful research and clinical tool, but improved resolution and scan times are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) present a postprocessing framework for optimization-driven simulation-based flow imaging, called 4D-flow High-resolution Imaging with a priori Knowledge Incorporating the Navier-Stokes equations and the discontinuous Galerkin method (4D-flow HIKING), (2) investigate the framework in synthetic tests, (3) perform phantom validation using laser particle imaging velocimetry, and (4) demonstrate the use of the framework in vivo. Methods: An optimizing computational fluid dynamics solver including adjoint-based optimization was developed to fit... (More)
Purpose: Three-dimensional, time-resolved blood flow measurement (4D-flow) is a powerful research and clinical tool, but improved resolution and scan times are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) present a postprocessing framework for optimization-driven simulation-based flow imaging, called 4D-flow High-resolution Imaging with a priori Knowledge Incorporating the Navier-Stokes equations and the discontinuous Galerkin method (4D-flow HIKING), (2) investigate the framework in synthetic tests, (3) perform phantom validation using laser particle imaging velocimetry, and (4) demonstrate the use of the framework in vivo. Methods: An optimizing computational fluid dynamics solver including adjoint-based optimization was developed to fit computational fluid dynamics solutions to 4D-flow data. Synthetic tests were performed in 2D, and phantom validation was performed with pulsatile flow. Reference velocity data were acquired using particle imaging velocimetry, and 4D-flow data were acquired at 1.5 T. In vivo testing was performed on intracranial arteries in a healthy volunteer at 7 T, with 2D flow as the reference. Results: Synthetic tests showed low error (0.4%-0.7%). Phantom validation showed improved agreement with laser particle imaging velocimetry compared with input 4D-flow in the horizontal (mean −0.05 vs −1.11 cm/s, P <.001; SD 1.86 vs 4.26 cm/s, P <.001) and vertical directions (mean 0.05 vs −0.04 cm/s, P =.29; SD 1.36 vs 3.95 cm/s, P <.001). In vivo data show a reduction in flow rate error from 14% to 3.5%. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results from 4D-flow HIKING show promise for future applications with higher resolution, shorter scan times, and accurate quantification of physiological parameters.
(Less)
- author
- Töger, Johannes LU ; Zahr, Matthew J. ; Aristokleous, Nicolas LU ; Markenroth Bloch, Karin LU ; Carlsson, Marcus LU and Persson, Per Olof
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-10
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- 4D-flow MRI, blood flow, computational fluid dynamics, simulation-based imaging
- in
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- volume
- 84
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 15 pages
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32270549
- scopus:85083067993
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
- DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.28269
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- ad184310-0907-4665-a7ab-cc810703c40b
- date added to LUP
- 2020-05-06 16:45:00
- date last changed
- 2024-09-19 21:36:26
@article{ad184310-0907-4665-a7ab-cc810703c40b, abstract = {{<p>Purpose: Three-dimensional, time-resolved blood flow measurement (4D-flow) is a powerful research and clinical tool, but improved resolution and scan times are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) present a postprocessing framework for optimization-driven simulation-based flow imaging, called 4D-flow High-resolution Imaging with a priori Knowledge Incorporating the Navier-Stokes equations and the discontinuous Galerkin method (4D-flow HIKING), (2) investigate the framework in synthetic tests, (3) perform phantom validation using laser particle imaging velocimetry, and (4) demonstrate the use of the framework in vivo. Methods: An optimizing computational fluid dynamics solver including adjoint-based optimization was developed to fit computational fluid dynamics solutions to 4D-flow data. Synthetic tests were performed in 2D, and phantom validation was performed with pulsatile flow. Reference velocity data were acquired using particle imaging velocimetry, and 4D-flow data were acquired at 1.5 T. In vivo testing was performed on intracranial arteries in a healthy volunteer at 7 T, with 2D flow as the reference. Results: Synthetic tests showed low error (0.4%-0.7%). Phantom validation showed improved agreement with laser particle imaging velocimetry compared with input 4D-flow in the horizontal (mean −0.05 vs −1.11 cm/s, P <.001; SD 1.86 vs 4.26 cm/s, P <.001) and vertical directions (mean 0.05 vs −0.04 cm/s, P =.29; SD 1.36 vs 3.95 cm/s, P <.001). In vivo data show a reduction in flow rate error from 14% to 3.5%. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results from 4D-flow HIKING show promise for future applications with higher resolution, shorter scan times, and accurate quantification of physiological parameters.</p>}}, author = {{Töger, Johannes and Zahr, Matthew J. and Aristokleous, Nicolas and Markenroth Bloch, Karin and Carlsson, Marcus and Persson, Per Olof}}, issn = {{0740-3194}}, keywords = {{4D-flow MRI; blood flow; computational fluid dynamics; simulation-based imaging}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{2231--2245}}, publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}}, series = {{Magnetic Resonance in Medicine}}, title = {{Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28269}}, doi = {{10.1002/mrm.28269}}, volume = {{84}}, year = {{2020}}, }