Advanced

Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature

Kazemzadeh, Khashayar LU ; Laureshyn, Aliaksei LU ; Winslott Hiselius, Lena LU and Ronchi, Enrico LU (2020) In Sustainability 12(7).
Abstract
Research into the bicycle level-of-service (BLOS) has been extensively conducted over the last three decades. This research has mostly focused on user perceptions of comfort to provide guidance for decision-makers and planners. Segments and nodes were studied first, followed by a network evaluation. Besides these investigations, several variables have also been utilized to
depict the users’ perspectives within the BLOS field, along with other cycling research domains that simultaneously scrutinized the users’ preferences. This review investigates the variables and indices employed in the BLOS area in relation to the field of bicycle flow and comfort research. Despite general
agreement among existing BLOS variables and the adopted... (More)
Research into the bicycle level-of-service (BLOS) has been extensively conducted over the last three decades. This research has mostly focused on user perceptions of comfort to provide guidance for decision-makers and planners. Segments and nodes were studied first, followed by a network evaluation. Besides these investigations, several variables have also been utilized to
depict the users’ perspectives within the BLOS field, along with other cycling research domains that simultaneously scrutinized the users’ preferences. This review investigates the variables and indices employed in the BLOS area in relation to the field of bicycle flow and comfort research. Despite general
agreement among existing BLOS variables and the adopted indices, several important research gaps remain to be filled. First, BLOS indices are often categorized based on transport components, while scarce attention has been paid to BLOS studies in trip-end facilities such as bicycle parking facilities.
The importance of these facilities has been highlighted instead within research related to comfort. Second, the advantages of separated bike facilities have been proven in many studies; however, scarce research has addressed the challenges associated with them (e.g., the heterogeneity within those facilities due to the presence of electric bikes and electric scooters). This issue is clearly noticeable
within the research regarding flow studies. Furthermore, network evaluation (in comparison to segment and node indices) has been studied to a lesser extent, whereas issues such as connectivity can be evaluated mainly through a holistic approach to the system. This study takes one step toward demonstrating the importance of the integration of similar research domains in the BLOS field to
eliminate the aforementioned shortcomings. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
bicycle, cycling, quality-of-service, comfort, traffic flow, level-of-service
in
Sustainability
volume
12
issue
7
article number
2944
publisher
MDPI AG
external identifiers
  • scopus:85083499468
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su1207294410.3390/su12072944
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b0efcfbd-0cbf-4f90-878d-714bdc7b9eac
date added to LUP
2020-04-07 16:28:28
date last changed
2020-10-07 06:56:50
@article{b0efcfbd-0cbf-4f90-878d-714bdc7b9eac,
  abstract     = {Research into the bicycle level-of-service (BLOS) has been extensively conducted over the last three decades. This research has mostly focused on user perceptions of comfort to provide guidance for decision-makers and planners. Segments and nodes were studied first, followed by a network evaluation. Besides these investigations, several variables have also been utilized to<br/>depict the users’ perspectives within the BLOS field, along with other cycling research domains that simultaneously scrutinized the users’ preferences. This review investigates the variables and indices employed in the BLOS area in relation to the field of bicycle flow and comfort research. Despite general<br/>agreement among existing BLOS variables and the adopted indices, several important research gaps remain to be filled. First, BLOS indices are often categorized based on transport components, while scarce attention has been paid to BLOS studies in trip-end facilities such as bicycle parking facilities.<br/>The importance of these facilities has been highlighted instead within research related to comfort. Second, the advantages of separated bike facilities have been proven in many studies; however, scarce research has addressed the challenges associated with them (e.g., the heterogeneity within those facilities due to the presence of electric bikes and electric scooters). This issue is clearly noticeable<br/>within the research regarding flow studies. Furthermore, network evaluation (in comparison to segment and node indices) has been studied to a lesser extent, whereas issues such as connectivity can be evaluated mainly through a holistic approach to the system. This study takes one step toward demonstrating the importance of the integration of similar research domains in the BLOS field to<br/>eliminate the aforementioned shortcomings.},
  author       = {Kazemzadeh, Khashayar and Laureshyn, Aliaksei and Winslott Hiselius, Lena and Ronchi, Enrico},
  issn         = {2071-1050},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {7},
  publisher    = {MDPI AG},
  series       = {Sustainability},
  title        = {Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su1207294410.3390/su12072944},
  doi          = {10.3390/su1207294410.3390/su12072944},
  volume       = {12},
  year         = {2020},
}