Sustainable drainage system site assessment method using urban ecosystem services
(2017) In Urban Ecosystems 20(2). p.293-307- Abstract
The United Kingdom’s recently updated approach to sustainable drainage enhanced biodiversity and amenity objectives by incorporating the ecosystem approach and the ecosystem services concept. However, cost-effective and reliable methods to appraise the biodiversity and amenity values of potential sustainable drainage system (SuDS) sites and their surrounding areas are still lacking, as is a method to enable designers to distinguish and link the amenity and biodiversity benefits that SuDS schemes can offer. In this paper, therefore, the authors propose two ecosystem services- and disservices-based methods (i.e. vegetation structure cover-abundance examination and cultural ecosystem services and disservices variables appraisal) to aid... (More)
The United Kingdom’s recently updated approach to sustainable drainage enhanced biodiversity and amenity objectives by incorporating the ecosystem approach and the ecosystem services concept. However, cost-effective and reliable methods to appraise the biodiversity and amenity values of potential sustainable drainage system (SuDS) sites and their surrounding areas are still lacking, as is a method to enable designers to distinguish and link the amenity and biodiversity benefits that SuDS schemes can offer. In this paper, therefore, the authors propose two ecosystem services- and disservices-based methods (i.e. vegetation structure cover-abundance examination and cultural ecosystem services and disservices variables appraisal) to aid SuDS designers to distinguish and link amenity and biodiversity benefits, and allow initial site assessments to be performed in a cost-effective and reliable fashion. Forty-nine representative sites within Greater Manchester were selected to test the two methods. Amenity and biodiversity were successfully assessed and habitat for species, carbon sequestration, recreation and education ecosystem services scores were produced, which will support SuDS retrofit design decision-making. Large vegetated SuDS sites with permanent aquatic features were found to be most capable of enhancing biodiversity- and amenity-related ecosystem services. Habitat for species and recreation ecosystem services were also found to be positively linked to each other. Finally, waste bins on site were found to help reduce dog faeces and litter coverage. Overall, the findings presented here enable future SuDS retrofit designs to be more wildlife friendly and socially inclusive.
(Less)
- author
- Mak, Chunglim ; Scholz, Miklas LU and James, Philip
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017-04
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Best management practice, Biodiversity, Carbon sequestration, Culture, Habitat for species, Vegetation structure
- in
- Urban Ecosystems
- volume
- 20
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 293 - 307
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000399011500004
- scopus:84986253511
- ISSN
- 1083-8155
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b4d8bce7-9335-44e7-b5ef-3d955d644a28
- date added to LUP
- 2016-11-09 10:40:42
- date last changed
- 2024-05-03 13:25:47
@article{b4d8bce7-9335-44e7-b5ef-3d955d644a28,
abstract = {{<p>The United Kingdom’s recently updated approach to sustainable drainage enhanced biodiversity and amenity objectives by incorporating the ecosystem approach and the ecosystem services concept. However, cost-effective and reliable methods to appraise the biodiversity and amenity values of potential sustainable drainage system (SuDS) sites and their surrounding areas are still lacking, as is a method to enable designers to distinguish and link the amenity and biodiversity benefits that SuDS schemes can offer. In this paper, therefore, the authors propose two ecosystem services- and disservices-based methods (i.e. vegetation structure cover-abundance examination and cultural ecosystem services and disservices variables appraisal) to aid SuDS designers to distinguish and link amenity and biodiversity benefits, and allow initial site assessments to be performed in a cost-effective and reliable fashion. Forty-nine representative sites within Greater Manchester were selected to test the two methods. Amenity and biodiversity were successfully assessed and habitat for species, carbon sequestration, recreation and education ecosystem services scores were produced, which will support SuDS retrofit design decision-making. Large vegetated SuDS sites with permanent aquatic features were found to be most capable of enhancing biodiversity- and amenity-related ecosystem services. Habitat for species and recreation ecosystem services were also found to be positively linked to each other. Finally, waste bins on site were found to help reduce dog faeces and litter coverage. Overall, the findings presented here enable future SuDS retrofit designs to be more wildlife friendly and socially inclusive.</p>}},
author = {{Mak, Chunglim and Scholz, Miklas and James, Philip}},
issn = {{1083-8155}},
keywords = {{Best management practice; Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Culture; Habitat for species; Vegetation structure}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{293--307}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Urban Ecosystems}},
title = {{Sustainable drainage system site assessment method using urban ecosystem services}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11252-016-0593-6}},
volume = {{20}},
year = {{2017}},
}