Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging : a systematic literature review of comparative studies

Pålsson, Henrik LU and Olsson, John LU (2023) In Packaging Technology and Science 36(6). p.391-409
Abstract
The use of disposable and reusable packaging is a hot topic in policy and practice, but different studies have come to different conclusions on when each packaging type is the more sustainable alternative. The purpose of this paper is to map and review scientific literature that compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages and e-commerce from a sustainability perspective. The methodology is a systematic literature review, which identifies 91 scientific papers. The paper describes and analyses the origin, characteristics and state of current knowledge and then proposes future research directions within five areas. It identifies and presents what is known in literature to achieve environmental and social sustainability, as... (More)
The use of disposable and reusable packaging is a hot topic in policy and practice, but different studies have come to different conclusions on when each packaging type is the more sustainable alternative. The purpose of this paper is to map and review scientific literature that compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages and e-commerce from a sustainability perspective. The methodology is a systematic literature review, which identifies 91 scientific papers. The paper describes and analyses the origin, characteristics and state of current knowledge and then proposes future research directions within five areas. It identifies and presents what is known in literature to achieve environmental and social sustainability, as well as circularity for disposable compared to reusable packaging. The review shows that the literature is to great extent qualitative, often studying individual products in a specific context. European studies dominate the current literature, and many of them revolve around a few types of products and packaging. Slightly under half of the studies use the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The review of these studies provides some indicative suggestions for when disposable and reusable packaging is environmentally preferable, but the number of LCA studies is too limited, and their content too fragmented to draw general conclusions about this. Overall, the review of 91 articles shows a great need for continued research that compares the environmental efficiency of disposable and reusable packaging. It also highlights the necessity for more knowledge to be able to clearly state under what conditions and in what contexts disposable and reusable packaging are the most sustainable options. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Circular economy, Disposable, Life cycle assessment, Literature review, Research agenda, Reusable, Sustainable
in
Packaging Technology and Science
volume
36
issue
6
pages
19 pages
publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
external identifiers
  • scopus:85150362563
ISSN
0894-3214
DOI
10.1002/pts.2722
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
The research in this article is funded by the Swedish Forest Industries
id
b56247fb-19c2-45c5-a615-8687a009190f
date added to LUP
2023-05-16 09:14:30
date last changed
2023-10-09 11:07:38
@article{b56247fb-19c2-45c5-a615-8687a009190f,
  abstract     = {{The use of disposable and reusable packaging is a hot topic in policy and practice, but different studies have come to different conclusions on when each packaging type is the more sustainable alternative. The purpose of this paper is to map and review scientific literature that compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages and e-commerce from a sustainability perspective. The methodology is a systematic literature review, which identifies 91 scientific papers. The paper describes and analyses the origin, characteristics and state of current knowledge and then proposes future research directions within five areas. It identifies and presents what is known in literature to achieve environmental and social sustainability, as well as circularity for disposable compared to reusable packaging. The review shows that the literature is to great extent qualitative, often studying individual products in a specific context. European studies dominate the current literature, and many of them revolve around a few types of products and packaging. Slightly under half of the studies use the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The review of these studies provides some indicative suggestions for when disposable and reusable packaging is environmentally preferable, but the number of LCA studies is too limited, and their content too fragmented to draw general conclusions about this. Overall, the review of 91 articles shows a great need for continued research that compares the environmental efficiency of disposable and reusable packaging. It also highlights the necessity for more knowledge to be able to clearly state under what conditions and in what contexts disposable and reusable packaging are the most sustainable options.}},
  author       = {{Pålsson, Henrik and Olsson, John}},
  issn         = {{0894-3214}},
  keywords     = {{Circular economy; Disposable; Life cycle assessment; Literature review; Research agenda; Reusable; Sustainable}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{05}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{391--409}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{Packaging Technology and Science}},
  title        = {{Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging : a systematic literature review of comparative studies}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pts.2722}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/pts.2722}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}