Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Diagnostic performance of routine ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities in an unselected Swedish population in 2000-2005

Romosan, G. ; Henriksson, E. ; Rylander, A and Valentin, Lil LU orcid (2009) In Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 34(5). p.526-533
Abstract
Objectives To determine the detection rate of fetal malformations and chromosomal abnormalities and the rate of false-positive ultrasound diagnoses at routine ultrasound examinations carried out by specially trained midwives in an unselected pregnant population front 2000 to 2005, and to describe the consequences of true-positive and false-positive ultrasound diagnoses of fetal malformations. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all babies born in Malmo, Sweden, between January 2000 and December 2005 by mothers residing in Malmo and of all fetuses with an ultrasound diagnosis of malformation made in the same time interval at the two units performing all routine pregnancy scans in Malmo. All women underwent two routine scans,... (More)
Objectives To determine the detection rate of fetal malformations and chromosomal abnormalities and the rate of false-positive ultrasound diagnoses at routine ultrasound examinations carried out by specially trained midwives in an unselected pregnant population front 2000 to 2005, and to describe the consequences of true-positive and false-positive ultrasound diagnoses of fetal malformations. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all babies born in Malmo, Sweden, between January 2000 and December 2005 by mothers residing in Malmo and of all fetuses with an ultrasound diagnosis of malformation made in the same time interval at the two units performing all routine pregnancy scans in Malmo. All women underwent two routine scans, at IS and 32 weeks, including scrutiny of the fetal anatomy. Detection rates and false-positive rates were calculated per fetus. Results The prevalence of chromosomally abnormal fetuses was 0.31% (52/16775); that of chromosomally normal fetuses with major and minor malformations was 1.80% (302/16775) and 1.32% (222/16775), respectively. The detection rate of fetuses with major malformations but normal chromosomes was 68% (205/302), with a detection rate at < 22 weeks of 37% (112/302). In addition, 46% (24/52) of all chromosomally abnormal fetuses were diagnosed before birth because a malformation was detected at ultrasound imaging, 33% (17/52) being detected at <22 gestational weeks. In all, 68 pregnancies were terminated because of an ultrasound diagnosis of fetal malformation (0.4% of all pregnancies and 47% of the pregnancies in which a fetal malformation was detected by ultrasound examination before 22 weeks). A false-positive ultrasound diagnosis of malformation was made in 0.19% (31/16180) of the normally formed fetuses and in 20 (0.12%) fetuses the abnormal finding persisted during pregnancy. No fetus assigned a false-positive diagnosis was lost by termination of pregnancy, but most were subjected to one or more unnecessary interventions before birth (e.g. amniocentesis), at birth (e.g. Cesarean section) or after birth (e.g. electrocardiogram, X-ray, ultrasound examination or treatment with antibiotics). Conclusions in a screening program consisting of one fetal anomaly scan at 18 weeks and another at 32 weeks the detection rate of major malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses was 68% with a detection rate of 37% at < 22 weeks. The corresponding detection rates of chromosomally abnormal fetuses were 46% and 33%. Fewer than one in 500 screened fetuses bad an ultrasound diagnosis of an anomaly that was not confirmed after birth. Copyright (C) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ultrasonography, congenital abnormalities, sensitivity and specificity
in
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
volume
34
issue
5
pages
526 - 533
publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
external identifiers
  • wos:000271801700008
  • scopus:70350503181
ISSN
1469-0705
DOI
10.1002/uog.6446
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b58b6859-1bd6-4a0b-b05d-32288efc5185 (old id 1518656)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 15:00:03
date last changed
2022-03-29 23:53:33
@article{b58b6859-1bd6-4a0b-b05d-32288efc5185,
  abstract     = {{Objectives To determine the detection rate of fetal malformations and chromosomal abnormalities and the rate of false-positive ultrasound diagnoses at routine ultrasound examinations carried out by specially trained midwives in an unselected pregnant population front 2000 to 2005, and to describe the consequences of true-positive and false-positive ultrasound diagnoses of fetal malformations. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all babies born in Malmo, Sweden, between January 2000 and December 2005 by mothers residing in Malmo and of all fetuses with an ultrasound diagnosis of malformation made in the same time interval at the two units performing all routine pregnancy scans in Malmo. All women underwent two routine scans, at IS and 32 weeks, including scrutiny of the fetal anatomy. Detection rates and false-positive rates were calculated per fetus. Results The prevalence of chromosomally abnormal fetuses was 0.31% (52/16775); that of chromosomally normal fetuses with major and minor malformations was 1.80% (302/16775) and 1.32% (222/16775), respectively. The detection rate of fetuses with major malformations but normal chromosomes was 68% (205/302), with a detection rate at &lt; 22 weeks of 37% (112/302). In addition, 46% (24/52) of all chromosomally abnormal fetuses were diagnosed before birth because a malformation was detected at ultrasound imaging, 33% (17/52) being detected at &lt;22 gestational weeks. In all, 68 pregnancies were terminated because of an ultrasound diagnosis of fetal malformation (0.4% of all pregnancies and 47% of the pregnancies in which a fetal malformation was detected by ultrasound examination before 22 weeks). A false-positive ultrasound diagnosis of malformation was made in 0.19% (31/16180) of the normally formed fetuses and in 20 (0.12%) fetuses the abnormal finding persisted during pregnancy. No fetus assigned a false-positive diagnosis was lost by termination of pregnancy, but most were subjected to one or more unnecessary interventions before birth (e.g. amniocentesis), at birth (e.g. Cesarean section) or after birth (e.g. electrocardiogram, X-ray, ultrasound examination or treatment with antibiotics). Conclusions in a screening program consisting of one fetal anomaly scan at 18 weeks and another at 32 weeks the detection rate of major malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses was 68% with a detection rate of 37% at &lt; 22 weeks. The corresponding detection rates of chromosomally abnormal fetuses were 46% and 33%. Fewer than one in 500 screened fetuses bad an ultrasound diagnosis of an anomaly that was not confirmed after birth. Copyright (C) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.}},
  author       = {{Romosan, G. and Henriksson, E. and Rylander, A and Valentin, Lil}},
  issn         = {{1469-0705}},
  keywords     = {{ultrasonography; congenital abnormalities; sensitivity and specificity}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{526--533}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology}},
  title        = {{Diagnostic performance of routine ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities in an unselected Swedish population in 2000-2005}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6446}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/uog.6446}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2009}},
}