Separation and not residency permit restores function in resignation syndrome : a retrospective cohort study
(2023) In European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 32(1). p.75-86- Abstract
Despite poor treatment results, a family-oriented approach and the securing of residency have been deemed essential to recovery from resignation syndrome (RS). In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated an alternative method involving environmental therapy, with patients separated from their parents, while actively abstaining from involving the asylum process in treatment. We examined medical records, social services acts, and residential care home acts from 13 individuals treated at Solsidan residential care home between 2005 and 2020. Severity and outcome were assessed with Clinical Global Impression, Severity and Improvement subscales. Thirteen participants were included and out of these nine (69%) recovered, i.e. they very much... (More)
Despite poor treatment results, a family-oriented approach and the securing of residency have been deemed essential to recovery from resignation syndrome (RS). In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated an alternative method involving environmental therapy, with patients separated from their parents, while actively abstaining from involving the asylum process in treatment. We examined medical records, social services acts, and residential care home acts from 13 individuals treated at Solsidan residential care home between 2005 and 2020. Severity and outcome were assessed with Clinical Global Impression, Severity and Improvement subscales. Thirteen participants were included and out of these nine (69%) recovered, i.e. they very much or much improved. Out of the eight that were separated, all recovered, also, one non-separated recovered. The difference in outcome between subjects separated and not was significant (p = 0.007). Moreover, out of the five which received a residency permit during treatment, one recovered whereas four did not. The difference in outcome between subjects granted residency and not was significant (p = 0.007). The data revealed three (23%) cases of simulation where parents were suspected to have instigated symptoms. Our evaluation suggests that separation from parents and abstaining from invoking residency permit could be essential components when treating RS. Relying on a family-oriented approach, and residency could even be detrimental to recovery. The examined intervention was successful also in cases of probable malingering by proxy.
(Less)
- author
- Sallin, Karl ; Evers, Kathinka ; Jarbin, Håkan LU ; Joelsson, Lars and Petrovic, Predrag
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Apathy, Family separation, Malingering, Refugees
- in
- European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- volume
- 32
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 75 - 86
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85109310439
- pmid:34223993
- ISSN
- 1018-8827
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00787-021-01833-3
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b58ecfcc-ce6b-4b60-b7f9-93966a07a089
- date added to LUP
- 2021-08-12 14:17:16
- date last changed
- 2024-06-15 14:07:51
@article{b58ecfcc-ce6b-4b60-b7f9-93966a07a089,
abstract = {{<p>Despite poor treatment results, a family-oriented approach and the securing of residency have been deemed essential to recovery from resignation syndrome (RS). In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated an alternative method involving environmental therapy, with patients separated from their parents, while actively abstaining from involving the asylum process in treatment. We examined medical records, social services acts, and residential care home acts from 13 individuals treated at Solsidan residential care home between 2005 and 2020. Severity and outcome were assessed with Clinical Global Impression, Severity and Improvement subscales. Thirteen participants were included and out of these nine (69%) recovered, i.e. they very much or much improved. Out of the eight that were separated, all recovered, also, one non-separated recovered. The difference in outcome between subjects separated and not was significant (p = 0.007). Moreover, out of the five which received a residency permit during treatment, one recovered whereas four did not. The difference in outcome between subjects granted residency and not was significant (p = 0.007). The data revealed three (23%) cases of simulation where parents were suspected to have instigated symptoms. Our evaluation suggests that separation from parents and abstaining from invoking residency permit could be essential components when treating RS. Relying on a family-oriented approach, and residency could even be detrimental to recovery. The examined intervention was successful also in cases of probable malingering by proxy.</p>}},
author = {{Sallin, Karl and Evers, Kathinka and Jarbin, Håkan and Joelsson, Lars and Petrovic, Predrag}},
issn = {{1018-8827}},
keywords = {{Apathy; Family separation; Malingering; Refugees}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{75--86}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry}},
title = {{Separation and not residency permit restores function in resignation syndrome : a retrospective cohort study}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01833-3}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00787-021-01833-3}},
volume = {{32}},
year = {{2023}},
}